Search This Site
Let’s Connect
About Chuq
Silicon Valley veteran doing Technical Community Management. Photographer with a strong interest in birds, wildlife and nature who is exploring the Western states and working to tell you the stories of the special places I've found.
Author and Blogger. They are not the same thing. Sports occasionally spoken here, especially hockey. Veteran of Sun, Apple, Palm, HP and now Infoblox, plus some you've never heard of. They didn't kill me, they made me better.
Person with opinions, and not afraid to share them. Debate team in high school and college; bet that's a surprise.
Support This Site
If you found this page interesting, please consider clicking through this ad and buying something.
If you do, Amazon will pay me a small percentage of the price. You don't spend any more on the item, and the money helps pay for the site and the more people who do this the more time I'll be able to spend on the site improving it and adding content.
More to Read
- Some Thoughts on Lightroom Keywords
- How not to be a doofus with a camera
- Beyond 'Vacation Snaps'
- A teachable moment (or why I love birding, even when I make a fool of myself)
- Sherman, set the wayback machine to…
- An audience of one....
- Talking about 'Stuff'
- What I do for a living…
- 50 reasons Why I Haven’t Been Blogging
Want more? Try this list...
New on the Blog
- Yosemite Road Trip 2013 – Day 1, teaching.
- The Raffi Torres Hit
- Back from Yosemite
- 2013 playoffs, round 2
- Fuji X100s Review – Fallin’in Love All Over Again
- If you give them an easy out, they’ll take it.
- Another reason Don Cherry should retire (or be retired…)
- 30 Days Of Sexism
- 2013 playoff predictions
- Calaveras Eagles Nest 2013
Rent Gear at Borrowlenses
Don't buy that gear before trying it out! Renting a lens you're considering buying is a great investment in saving yourself from buyer's remorse!
And if it's a piece or gear you aren't going to use constantly, renting it when you need it is a great way to save money, and I highly recommend Borrowlenses as a place to rent high quality, well-maintained gear.
Monthly Archives: October 2003
Sharks: after five games
first, an interesting piece out of Philly:
We knew going in that this team was going to be offensively challenged. And so far, it’s shown itself to be, well, offensively challenged. But not offensive. There were a number of "gee, that went in when I was in the {ahl, bundes league, WHL, etc}" shots — we have some kids are going to have to learn to adjust to NHL caliber goaltending. Even then, we’re going to be a 2-1, 3-2 kinda team.
What I like: Someone please tell me why Darryl Sutter couldn’t teach that kind of precious, crisp transition passing in his entire tenure here? And they do it consistently? (actually, I think the answer is fairly simple: under Darryl Sutter’s system, cross-ice passes were failures under all circumstances, so players always went to the near man up the boards, even if he was covered. Very little innovation in the breakout, it was a grinder game. With Wilson, it seems the players have a lot more leeway in passing to the open man, even if, gasp, it crosses the center of the ice. And Wilson seems to take the attitude that if nothing bad happens, it wasn’t a mistake — so instead of never trying things, players hustle back and break up problems before they happen.).
The team is fast (and the ice is pretty decent!). it passes. it controls. It transitions well for the most part (It struggled more against Ottawa, which is the team odds-on with many to win the Stanley cup, and which plays the kind of game the Sharks are now aspiring to — I’m not at all suprised Ottawa adjusted and made life interesting — and I thought the sharks handled themselves okay against a clearly better team). Think how few offsides are called against the sharks. How few icings. How few WHISTLES in the two home games. how few dump and chases, how little "stuff it in the corner and grind for 40 seconds". How the Sharks have given up on the "dump and change" strategy of hockey.
I like the work ethic I’m seeing. I like the team’s willingness to take some chances. I’m really liking Scott Parker: every shift he gets, he puts his head down and hustles his butt like it’s his last shift in his career. he causes havoc, he fights to create screens, and he’s doing what I want a guy like him to do BEYOND fighting. he’ll likely turn himself into a rival of Jeff Odgers for all-time fan favorite at this rate.
So in my mind, even when they lose, this is a much more interesting team to watch. (the opposing point of view, from someone who’s seen more Sharks games than I have, and who’s been at Sharks games going back to the Cow Palace days, is that he hates the new team. Absolutely, positively can’t stand it. Yeah, they work hard, yeah, they pass, but it’s a bunch of kids who can’t score. and he has a point, and he’s seriously missing Owen and Teemu — but look how they helped us last year. At some point, you have to throw it out and start over, and for all we remember the division championship, we need to remember all of those other under .500 years we had getting there. One year where it all fell together and Dallas fell apart doesn’t make a successful dynasty)
This is clearly a young team. It’s going to have good nights, and not so good nights. There’s going to be inconsistency. We’ve already seen a bit of that, but given the last two nights, they took it to heart and really put on a show at home. we’ve lost a lot of scoring — and we have to see who’s going to step up and take charge trying to replace that. (Patrick Marleau, white courtesy phone please). Guys who’ve been in the shadow of Nolan have to step into the light now. I expect some will, just not overnight. I expect this team to season and improve as the season goes along. If it can hang near .500 the first 25 games, we’ll be okay. It should finish better than it started. But right now, I’m shifting my goal down a bit from 80-85 points to 75-80. I just think there will be early struggles to knock pucks in the net. May they make it up in Februrary…
I’m really impressed with Damphousse. He took the offseason "come in and earn your salary" to heart. Against Philly, he was more physical tahn he was most of last season. My big worry here is whether he can hold up to playing that way.
The defense, given it’s missing Stuart, is really holding up well. It doesn’t act like it’s full of untested rookies. It makes mistakes, but it also hustles its butt off to fix them. It’s going to be okay, and it’ll get better.
One serious problem: Scott Thornton. In two games, he’s looked soft, slow and tenative. he’s not right — it looks like he’s already injured to me. I caught him flexing a knee at one point during the Ottawa game, but I’m more worried about a shoulder. he simply doesn’t seem to be the presence we need him to be.
Korolyuk is, well, Korolyuk. someone please get Coach Wilson a large bottle of Tums, and get me one, too. He’ll be a net positive to the team, but always making life interesting. hand me a Tums, please?
Nabokov is looking good, but has to be better. He’s, oh, top 1/3 of the league, we need him top 1/4 or higher.
It’s too early to panic. we’ve played some tough teams (Philly is 2-0-2, Edmonton is 3-2, Ottawa is 3-1) and overall, hung in well. We should have beat Philly, we just didn’t beat Hackett. We have a couple of rather weak teams coming in next, and I hope we’ll go 2-1 in the next three games.
I mean, honestly — if you pick a team to challenge for the 8th playoff spot, and the team we think might win the Cup beats them, isn’t that supposed to happen? Now, if Chicago schools them… But if they play the way they played Philly or Ottawa, Chicago won’t. So let’s see.
Some thoughts on foo camp…
Now that life (ahem) Elsewhere is normalizing again, I have time to throw a few more comments on foo camp. Unlike lots of folks, I’m not a fan of snap judgements, I prefer to think it over and give myself some time to figure out what I’m thinking (which, I guess, makes me a lousy candidate for a high profile blogger, which is fine by me…). Saves me from having to write even more apologies and changed my mind notes than I already do…
That was one of the most interesting and fascinating times I’ve had in a long time. Laurie and I have a term we use, talking to adults, to describe those times when we’re with people who are mentally energizing and interesting, and who stretch our knowledge with their own. We’re lucky to know a good number of adults in our lives — but foo camp was different. It was nothing but talking to adults, and I was honored to be included and contribute a little bit in return in the ways I could. I more or less overloaded after a whle, trying to keep track of who and what and why, and it’s taken me a few days to start seeing the interrelationships of all of this stuff.
Going back over the weekend, a couple of things stood out (other than the session on disassembling the Prius
Howtoons: a group out of MIT who are trying to put together projects to get kids interested in hardware and tinkering again. Their worry (and the more I think about it, the more I agree with them) is that the generations we’re bringing up now don’t build things and don’t create things; they use things. So HowToons is an attempt to help kids discover the joy of building and experimenting, and is set up to be easily distributable offline as well as on, using materials generally available, even in non-developed parts of the world. These folks deserve some support and visibility, and if you have ideas for projects they can use in HowToons, you really ought to pass them along. It’s great stuff.
Socialtext: We’ve all been talking about wikis and weblogs and klogs and IM and other technologies, but technologies are only as interesting as how they’re used. One of the things I’ve been looking at the last couple months is how to use these tools in an IS environment to improve communication, document operations and projects, create and manage schedules better, and find solutions for the Fred was the only one who knew how that worked problem. So is socialtext, a group working to integrate these things and de-geek them so that they can be used in the kind of environments I run around in. Looks very interesting. Soon as I get a spare minute…
SecureSoftware: these folks are building tools to help discover and prevent problem code. It has the potential to take us beyond hey, watch out for buffer overflows lectures in building code that can withstand today’s hostile cracking environments…
It was neat to finally meet Stewart Brand, and it’s safe to say without his work, many of the folks who were at Foo Camp wouldn’t have been. One of the people I never had a chance to sit down and talk to was Doc Searles, because it seemed every time I saw him, he was surrounded by a group of people and he was explaining how to overthrow the US political system (note: not the American Government! that’s useful, in the right hands… grin). But it was amazing to see that many people, and so few egos. Or maybe compatible egos.
Which made some of the discussion about foo camp Out Here somewhat disturbing. it’s been pretty much hashed out so I won’t re-open it, but I do want to pass along something Laurie said to me after the Cubs collapsed and lost game 6:
expected, but still disappointing
Exactly.
Thanks to Tim and the entire O’Reilly crew for a great weekend.
Foo Camp.
Back from Foo Camp. It may sound hackneyed, but it was a thrill just to be invited. I think Dori caught my feelings exactly: Most frequently heard comment at Foo Camp: “I have no idea what I’m doing here. Everyone here is so much smarter than me.” It’s pretty damn cool to be around 200 people who’re all thinking that.
I went in thinking I’d sit back and watch, pick a few brains, track down some of the people I wanted to meet face to face. It was interesting to see others doing the same, and to find I was one of the folks people were tracking down, as I was tracking down. Overall, very much an ego-free zone, with a wide ranging flavor of sharing and listening — everyone was interested in what others were doing. There was a huge amount of “oh — you need to meet this person!” going on, and I’m sure a fair amount of business was done, and a lot of followups are going to go on as well.
I found myself at a table Saturday night with a bunch of folks, and we all sort of took turns hashing out various things. I floated out my “rethink the mailing list” stuff, last seen here and here, and which has been floating around in the “this doesn’t seem quite right, but I can’t put my finger on why” mode — and much of it was quickly and correctly shot down, making it clear to me not tha the idea was wrong, but it was being poorly presented and superficial, so I ended up crawling in a corner and rethinking my stuff from scratch. I’d scheduled a session to hash over these issues on sunday (later cancelled after Scott McCloud‘s session moved in at the same time, because I was more interested in hearing Scott talk than myself talk… )
And I now realize I’d decided what the answer was early in the process, tried to build a rationale for that decision, and the whole thing bogged down when I hit a dead end in the new design matrix. And then wandered around in the dark wondering where the door was. I spent Saturday night rewriting my first draft of a needs and feature list, and now it seems to all make sense — expect details as soon as I flesh a couple of things out. Very implementable, right from scratch. Hopefully I feel as good about it on draft 2.
Ran into a bunch of folks I really wanted to meet (one highlight — finally got to sit down and talk at lenght with Robert Scoble, and he’s a very charming and interesting person, his being a mortal enemy and all. (seriously — had a chance to play with his tablet PC a bit, and it’s a neat bit of technology, but I think the market’s it’s most useful for are also priced out of it for now, so it’s going to be a niche product for a while — but I really see it as a big winner in Education at some point….).
right now, I’m simultaneously wasted and exhausted and wired — simply trying to filter through, synthesize and file what went on the last 48 hours. I’m going to be useless for a couple of days while I get everything into the right niche in the old subconscious.
Continuing themes that kept popping up: reputation systems, implicit and explicit. security issues, development tools, have you met….., and did you know they’re disassembling a Prius in the parking lot? (it’s okay, it’s a rental)
It was neat to watch everyone just sort of pitch in and make things happen. It was a hugely diverse group of drivers, but without people demanding access to the steering wheel.
More later. time to crash — too much swirling around to write coherently. What a kick in the pants; one I really needed on a number of levels.
as I told Tim at one point: Congrats, you’ve reinvented the Science Fiction convention. At least to some degree. Few cnventions are as well catered, or as low on the ego-conflict scale….
But you know what? I really, really liked Sebastopol. Too bad it’s so far from where I work….
how hockey has changed…
and how rapidly it’s changed.
Nice CBC article on Jose Theodore, which had a comment that struck me funny:
Theodore finished the year with an unimpressive 20-31-6 record, 2.90 goals-against average and .908 save percentage. Not surprisingly, the Canadiens missed the playoffs.
In today’s games, a sub-3 GAA and an above .9 save percentage are unimpressive. Compared to his Vezina-winning season the year before (2.11 GAA, .931 S%) they are.
But tonight, Grant Fuhr is going into the hall of fame, a well-deserved honor. Fuhr is also a Vezina winner. The year he won that trophy, his numbers?
GAA 3.43, save percentage .881.
In other words, a performance that won Fuhr a Vezina 15 years ago would qualify him for an AHL team today.
The difference? goalies are better athletes, goalie technique is much improved, but most important, goalie equipment has improved (and grown in size) to the point where the goaltender now has a massive advantage over the shooter. This year’s moderate reduction in leg pads won’t hurt, but doesn’t solve the problem of Hockey’s fast-march into the realm of soccer scores.
unfortunately, I don’t think there is an easy solution here. what are you going to do, tell teams their goalies can’t be good athletes? Remove enough gear that goalies are injured by Al MacInnis slapshots?
Tough call — but something does have to be done to even out the balance between offense and defense. I’m not asking for 8-6 games; just that the shooter have some chance of scoring, other than dumb luck…..
Reason to Celebrate..
Jordin Tootoo is set to become the first Inuit to play in the NHL.
I’ve seen him play a little, and he’s sure to become a fan favorite.
It’s a significant time for Jordin, and for his people. And I want to congratulate him, and I can’t wait to see him in San Jose when the Predators show up…

