A few thoughts on the olympic hockey, now that it’s all done.

Congrats to the Swedes for winning — and the Finns for pushing them hard and almost taking it. The gold medal game was great, and played by the two best TEAMS in the tourney. But having said that, the Czechs (in Bronze) and Russians (fourth place) have no shame, and all of them are winners in my books, along with the Swiss and the Latvians.

The U.S. and Canada both disappointed — I’d say they had better players than other teams, but they weren’t teams, they were groups of players. The Finn’s, especially, gelled and got the job done. The Finns and Swedes played like they WANTED the medals, the US and the Canadians looked to me more like they expected the medals.

Which is in some ways an unfair slam — every player on every team played hard, and it’s easy to criticize. The problem I saw with both the U.S. and Canada teams were a combination of factors, but I think the key one was age. Putting a team together is tough under best of circumstances, even without politics. And the politics here is a hard one: do you bring in new, young players, or do you recognize those players that have been supporting and contributing to the program for years? A good national GM has to do both, and deal with the need for players who can help the youngsters handle the pressure, too. I’m glad I don’t have to figure that out.

But in retrospect, both the U.S. and Canada teams had too many veterans that just couldn’t handle the larger ice surface AND the teams with younger, faster legs. This was especially noticeable with the Russians, where Ovechkin pretty literally skated circles around everyone and made both teams look like pylons. That larger, wider surface made a huge impact here, and the teams that opted for speed and youth over size and endurance won out and got medals.

Perhaps the U.S. and Canada could have sent over better teams — but there’s something to be said to being loyal to those who have been loyal to you, too, and I can’t really argue with who sent sent, because the kids will be here in four years in Vancouver (maybe, if the NHL doesn’t stop going; my bet is they’ll work it out) — and there’s no guarantee that the Finns or Swedes wouldn’t have taken it anyway.

so from my point of view, this wasn’t a disaster for either country. Let’s not criticize the U.S. or Canada, but instead celebrate how the other countries have come along and made this a real fight. There are bigger things that winning, sometimes, and let’s not forget them.

Me, I’m just going to enjoy the memories of some really killer hockey, and not worry about the rest. And look forward to four years from now, when the teams will all meet again, and we WILL see a bunch of the younger guys that didn’t get a chance this time. It may not have been the best tourney for Chelios or Modano, but they won’t HAVE one in four years, and after all they’ve done for USA hockey, didn’t they deserve one final kick at the can?

I think they did. And I’d rather credit those who DID win than kvetch at those who didn’t, because otherwise, you (even by implication) belittle their victories a bit…