Search This Site
Silicon Valley veteran doing Technical Community Management. Photographer with a strong interest in birds, wildlife and nature who is exploring the Western states and working to tell you the stories of the special places I've found.
Author and Blogger. They are not the same thing. Sports occasionally spoken here, especially hockey. Veteran of Sun, Apple, Palm, HP and now Infoblox, plus some you've never heard of. They didn't kill me, they made me better.
Person with opinions, and not afraid to share them. Debate team in high school and college; bet that's a surprise.
You should click on this. Really.
We pay for this site thanks to our sponsors. If you found this page interesting, we ask that you consider clicking through this ad to amazon.com and buying yourself something. It costs you nothing, but Amazon will pay me some money when you buy through this link.
That helps me keep this site free for all to use, and helps fund the time it takes to write and maintain the site. Without the kind people who buy things through my sponsors, this site wouldn't exist. You were going to buy that thing anyway, so why not buy it and help us keep the site up and running and without those nasty ads that get in your face when you go to some of the other sites
More to Read
- Some Thoughts on Lightroom Keywords
- How not to be a doofus with a camera
- Beyond 'Vacation Snaps'
- A teachable moment (or why I love birding, even when I make a fool of myself)
- Sherman, set the wayback machine to…
- An audience of one....
- Talking about 'Stuff'
- What I do for a living…
- 50 reasons Why I Haven’t Been Blogging
Want more? Try this list...
New on the Blog
- Hugh Daniel Memorial info
- Flag Day
- That was Steve, This is Now. And We’re Just Getting Started
- Tales to Inspire A New Generation of Developers
- 2013 Playoffs, stanley cup finals edition
- Calaveras Bald Eagle Nest 2013
- A quick anecdote about life at Palm…
- It was four years ago today….
- Quick note for folks who know Hugh Daniel
- Getting started in bird photography: Choose Your Weapons
Rent Gear at Borrowlenses
Don't buy that gear before trying it out! Renting a lens you're considering buying is a great investment in saving yourself from buyer's remorse!
And if it's a piece or gear you aren't going to use constantly, renting it when you need it is a great way to save money, and I highly recommend Borrowlenses as a place to rent high quality, well-maintained gear.
Monthly Archives: May 2007
“Frankly, I live in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area and it’s tough for all the clubs to get media attention, particularly when they’re having tough years on the ice. There’s some real downside to having multiple teams in one market,” Bettman said Monday in his state-of-the-union address.
My spin: Is Gary Bettman that afraid of the Toronto Maple Leafs? Do the Leafs have that much power that they can veto a second team coming to Southern Ontario?
Hey, Maybe he’s just speaking reality. Look at the challenges that go in in various sports where there are two teams in a market. One team ends up dominant over the others, whether it’s in TV ratings (and access), newspaper coverage, fan mindset. Look at the challenges of, say, TV in Los Angeles, where there are two baseball, two basketball and two hockey teams (and no football!), all trying to get onto two cable stations and the same sports pages. Here in the Bay area, the Giants outdraw and out-TV the A’s by a wide margin, have access to a much more powerful radio station, and generally take priority on the sports pages (despite, of course, looking at which team’s won more world series and pennants in the last 20 years).
Look at how the Devils and the Islanders play second and third fiddle to the Rangers, even when the Rangers suck.
It’s not JUST about fans. It’s about corporate money, it’s about sponsors, it’s about media. And if you look at multi-team markets in all sports, all around the continent, there are challenges. If you were to, say, move a team into Kitchener or some place outside of the Leaf’s no-go zone, you still have to deal with getting them on cable and CBC (and let’s not forget, it’s the Toronto Sports Network for a reason, and the CBC in the new TV contract had to actually and formally admit that Ottawa existed and ought to be on TV once in a while. Imagine if you added a third team to the mix!).
Now, in reality, the demand for hockey — and NHL hockey — in Ontario is amazing. the prices that the Leafs can charge are abusive, well beyond insane. But putting another team in there, as opposed to putting a team back in, say, Winnipeg?
You KNOW the entire region is going to support a team in Winnipeg. You can bet that fans will support another team in Ontario, but will the media? TV? sponsors and corporate? And at what price tickets? Guess right, and the new Winnipeg Jets succeeds wildly. Guess wrong? and you have hockey’s LA Clippers.
Now, I think a team in Ontario could work. but I don’t think it’s a no-brainer, and I don’t think people reacting to all of this are thinking through all of the business complications, just looking at being able to buy tickets that don’t cost as much as they do for the Leafs games. If only it were that simple…
There are so many bombshells here it’s hard to tell where to start – obviously monitoring the player reps email activities within their NHLPA accounts is suspect, but accessing Trent Klatt’s outside, personal email clearly crosses the line. Note also how Saskin and Kim were aware of the snooping scandal that brought down Hewlett-Packard chairwoman Patricia Dunn – they halted their activities for a while, but resumed when the heat started rising again.
What interests me here is how the NHLPA’s IT group seems to have helped this “Big Brother” program along. According to the report Kim used Klatt’s NHLPA password to access the outside personal account – presumably Kim got that password through shoddy security policies, or someone in IT provided it to him (unless of course it was “pass”, in which case, shame on you Trent Klatt). Then there’s the point about providing the details of what was supposedly a “secret ballot” to end the 2004-5 lockout and ratify the new CBA. It would appear that there’s at least one bad apple within the NHLPA IT department…
When not blogging here as the Forechecker, my mild-mannered alter ego works in IT. I sure as heck know I’m not going to look favorably on any resumes coming across my desk that list network security for the NHLPA as working experience!
I spent a decade in IT, too — and to be honest? It’s not necessarily that simple. First, I’m sure the union’s IT world is pretty small, because it’s a fairly small organization. they probably don’t HAVE a network security guy. And ultimately, IT reports up to management, and if management says to do something; you either do it, or you get out.
And no, I’m not defending the IT people there, merely pointing out this can be a really rough situation if you get a lot of pressure from above. Let’s keep the focus on who was CALLING the shots here. The involvement of IT speaks more to the abuse of the power of Saskin and his team than failings within the IT organization.
But this sucks. If it wasn’t clear before that Saskin had to be put down, it is now. I hope Saskin isn’t stupid enough to force a big fight over the compensation issue (reports like this will hopefully scare him off from that) — because what the NHLPA needs to do is focus on rebuilding and moving forward, not on this.
And that would, I hope, include looking at how to enable IT to not feel it has to get involved in things it knows is wrong.
easier said than done, of course. Espoecially in small shops.
Two for Elbowing: Third round predictions…:
So, I’m 9 for 12 for the playoffs, my best run in years.
The two conference finals:
Anaheim/Detroit: Anaheim in 5.
Ottawa/Buffalo: I’ll pick Buffalo in 7. (now, watch Ottawa sweep…)
And, because I didn’t believe in Ottawa quite enough, I went 1 for 2, and 10 for 14 so far in the playoffs (too bad I didn’t have money down this year…)
In the final?
Ottawa in 5. I think they’re playing better right now. but there are so many wildcards, you could flip coins and get it right. Guigere outplaying Emery? Or will Emery start getting recognition for how well he’s played? Wlll Pronger be the good witch or the bad witch? will he focus his game or go *pop* again? The ducks are doing a “win it for Teemu”, which, if Teemu plays well, could make this interesting.
I think it’s going to be a fun series, no matter what. Either team could win it in five, but I think it’s Ottawa’s year.
My conn-smyth candidates: Alfreddson if Ottawa wins, Guigiere if Anaheim wins.
Some might think that Doug Wilson’s reaction (as I’ve pointed to this week) might be a bit — extreme. It’s not like the Sharks missed the playoffs, after all.
But the reality is, this was the year this team was aimed at; last year, “the kids got good experience” was good enough, this year, the expectation was for all the pieces to be there and click. Now, that didn’t happen — Mark Bell just never came close to what he was expected to be, not in any remote way, and I think the team spent a lot of time trying to fill that hole, never completely successfully.
But, also realize this: In the mid-90′s expansion, the Sharks showed up, then a year later, the Senators and Tampa. Then a bit after that, Anaheim and Florida.
Tampa’s won a cup. Anaheim and Florida have been to the finals. This year, the Senators and Anaheim are going to the finals, and one of them will win a cup.
San Jose is the only one of the teams from this round of expansion that haven’t made the cup finals.
That has to hurt, and cause heartburn. And it has to hurt even more that it’s two teams from that expansion period fighting it out this year… And I’m convinced Wilson believes the western team should ahve been the Sharks, and while we saw the Wing’s ability to make game 6 VERY interesting and the series a lot closer than maybe we expected, ultimately, Wilson’s convinced it’s waht the Sharks did NOT do, not what the Wings did.
And in that context, his reaction makes sense….
News – Sharks GM Looks Back On Playoff Exit – Forward To 07-08 – San Jose Sharks:
Most injuries are revealed when the playoffs conclude, as what happened with Marleau’s shoulder, but others that came to light were sports hernias with Guerin, Smith, Vesa Toskala and Jonathan Cheechoo (a double).
“Vesa could have played,” said Wilson. “(With Cheechoo), they were shocked he was still playing. It is a simple procedure to fix.”
TOUGH YEAR FOR BELL
Wilson did discuss the difficult season for Mark Bell who was talented offseason pickup, who then had some off-ice issues and then found himself a healthy scratch in the playoffs.
“Mark got off on the wrong foot,” said Wilson. “He didn’t play the way he wanted and we didn’t get what we wanted for him. We’re looking forward to getting back the hockey player he was before. I think he can be a really good hockey player (for us).”
San Jose Mercury News – Sharks GM won’t guarantee coach’s return:
General manager Doug Wilson needed two weeks to calm down after the San Jose Sharks’ second-round exit from the playoffs, and he’s still not ready to make any quick decisions on the futures of his players and coaches.
Saying he’s “frustrated and disappointed” with the end of an otherwise successful season, Doug Wilson plans to decide by next week whether coach Ron Wilson will return to San Jose next season.
The general manager was at times both blunt and evasive Monday in a wide-ranging interview, his first since San Jose was eliminated by the Detroit Red Wings in six games two weeks ago.
Nice to see Doug Wilson isn’t standing firm.
Now, if he cares about what my suggestions are, they’re here:
Actually, we seem pretty close overall.
A couple of other comments:
The Sharks’ postseason collapse included Ron Wilson’s thinly veiled scolding for captain Patrick Marleau, who struggled throughout the Detroit series despite a reputation for strong postseason play. Marleau’s leadership skills are questioned repeatedly by fans who don’t see how the taciturn son of a Saskatchewan farmer can be an effective captain.
“I trust that dressing room,” Doug Wilson said. “I don’t micromanage. There will be conversations that will take place. We’ll handle it.”
the only difference between Patrick Marleau and Steve Yzerman is that Yzerman won a Cup, and that shut up the critics. Otherwise, they’re the same style of captain. Ditto, say, Trevor Linden or in Ottawa, Alfreddson. Now, that’s not saying that Marleau is going to match any of those guys in terms of success as a captain, but I will note that Alfredsson has JUST this year beaten the critics and made carried his team to the conference finals, and he’s got about a full season of games more than Marleau has.
Steve Yzerman joined the wings in 83-84, became captain in 86, and the wings didn’t make it to the cup final until 1994-95 and didn’t win the cup until 2 years later; that’s 862 games before they made the final, and about 1000 games before Yzerman finally won a Cup. In other words — Marleau’s not exactly doing badly compared to similar captains with similar styles and similar criticisms. Trevor Linden, FWIW, had the fastest track to the Cup final of all of these guys, getting there in about 550 games.
So, my suggestion to fans ripping Marleau: chill.
Doug Wilson understands fans’ concerns that the Sharks are turning into the West Coast version of the Ottawa Senators, who struggled through years of regular-season successes and playoff failures before finally breaking through to the Stanley Cup finals this year. The Sharks blew leads in three of their losses to Detroit, including a pair of two-goal margins.
You know what? If we’re the West’s “Ottawa”, that’s not bad. After all, their captain stepped it up this year and carried them into the final this year — and Marleau seems to be following that development path pretty well so far. What we don’t want to be is Buffalo, who (again) didn’t get the job done and now has the unfortunate job of figuring out what players they can afford to sign and how to reload around them. Buffalo’s key shot was this year, and now the chances they keep both Drury and Briere are pretty small, and they don’t have the track record of Detroit as far as reloading in place. The Sharks, thanks to smart budgeting and planning, aren’t at that point and look to have a couple more years with the core of the team together. We’re not worrying about how to keep Marleau and Thornton, we’re worrying about what to do to Mark Bell.
Oh, sorry. WITH Mark Bell, not TO. Freudian slip there.
The Pronger hit — and the commentary and responses by various people and fans — really sums up all that’s wrong with hockey today. Good to the NHL for giving Pronger a game off. Bad to the NHL because if they really want this crap to stop, one game suspensions won’t cut it. More importantly, ad-hoc suspensions won’t cut it, players have to know before they do what Pronger did that the suspension will be coming, so they don’t put themselves in a position to be suspended in the first place.
One person I’ll cut some slack to is Brian Burke — because while he espoused a very strong line that the suspension was undeserved (and likely believes it to some degree or another, given how old-school he is and his team is), that set of quotes he gave was one of the most beautiful pieces of spinning the situation you’ll ever see. He not only backed his team (as you’d expect him to), he put the team in a position of not only having to beat the Wings, but the league and the refs, too — and that’s a wonderful rallying point for the team to motivate around. That’s a master at work — and a great reminder that anything anyone in a position of authority needs to have their words taken with a grain of salt, because if they’re saying it in public, there’s likely some hidden agenda. In this case, the hidden agenda was giving his team even more reason to spank the Wings.
And so they did. Anyone else looking forward to seeing this series go 7 games? And do you doubt that it will? the only problem is one we worried about from early in the season: that whoever comes out of the west will be exhausted and beat up, and easy fodder for whatever eastern team makes the cup final.
Given that Ottawa will likely put away Buffalo in game 5, and be able to rest up and have fun watching the Wings and Ducks beat the crap out of each other for another few days and show up to the cup final with no rest time — this scnario is coming true, and seems to benefit another Cup out east…
And I say again, watching the Wings, even losing to the Ducks tonight, I feel less pissed off at the Sharks for going out in the last round to them. I think given the Wings lost both Yzerman and Shanahan many of us just believed they’d fade, and now they’re proving us all very, very wrong. more power to them. I still think the Ducks will prevail, but barely.
And that’s assuming Pronger doesn’t go sideways again… This suspension is the dark side of Chris Pronger, and Sharks fans have seen this before. He’s got a temper,and you can get under his skin. In many cases, what he does is turn this around and focus his energy on kicking his opponent’s butt. but if he gets frustrated, he more or less goes berserker, and then he can be his own team’s worst enemy. San Jose fans don’t call him Big Whiney Defenseman for nothing, and we’ve seen both aspects of Pronger over the years. If he can be channeled properly, he’s one hell of a player. If he goes sideways, he can make his team self-destruct. Just ask the Oilers… or the Blues.
So it’ll be interesting to see which Pronger shows up in the next game…
Yesterday Engadget posted an incorrect story about an iPhone delay, and I wanted to go into greater detail about how this happened.
At 9:09am CDT yesterday a number of Apple employees received an email that appeared to be from Apple corporate reporting that the iPhone and the next version of OS X had been delayed. An Apple employee who we trust then forwarded this email to us. Let’s be clear that this is someone who we know without any doubt is an employee of Apple, not someone we merely believe to be an employee of Apple. We contacted our source after receiving their email, and they confirmed for us that they had indeed received this email, an email which by all appearances was a legitimate email from Apple corporate.
This wouldn’t be the first time someone forged an internal memo, although I can only think of one or two cases.
For a reporter, this kind of thing — an internal memo to a company’s employees — is solid gold. You don’t often get inside information more sound than a memo stating plans — and it is not uncommon to see these sorts of internal emails quoted in mainstream newspapers and magazines — but we are still aware of precisely how dangerous it would be to leave any story at that. So after verifying that the email was indeed sent to internal Apple email lists — but before publishing anything — we immediately contacted Apple PR, trying to reach our contacts on their PR team that handles iPod / iPhone matters. It was before business hours on the West coast, though, so we even called an Apple PR manager via their private cellphone in search of a statement. When no one was immediately available, we left voicemail and email.
Of course, given Apple’s propensity to not comment on anything, if you waited for them to comment, you’d wait a long, long time. Which is, of course, what they’d want. So in some way, this is a no-win situation for a reporter, but Apple’s tendency towards stonewalling makes posting something like this (IMHO) quite justifiable. It’s just in this case, it caused all hell to break loose.
Of course, most likely, Steve had had a bit of a temper tantrum all over a number of people, and everyone was quite busy either doing damage control or trying to figure out what happened, or looking for someone’s head to hang in front of the moat around IL1 for Steve, so even if they were predisposed to respond, they were probably a bit busy.
Fake indeed, but it still came from someone familiar with Apple’s internal mail systems, lists, memo composition structure, etc., who found a way to plant a phony memo in the inboxes of who knows how many Apple employees. (Both emails are published in the original post.) Why Apple took nearly two hours to respond to the situation we do not know.
Simple. It was before business hours, and everyone was trying to get a handle on what happened and what to do; and I’m sure both legal and PR were busily working out the wording on the second message.
GigaOM brought up the following point on this:
The other notable twist is in how the fake news was spread. It seems someone figured out how to send an email to Apple employees around the world, putting the familiar “Bullet News” in the from line (for Apple’s sake, one hopes this is not as simple as sending an email to “email@example.com”).
Well, I wrote the listserver used to distribute groups internal to Apple, so I can comment on this (a bit). The easy answer is “hell, no, Apple’s not an idiot”. But that doesn’t mean the server can’t be spoofed; any email system can be spoofed if you understand email and study the system. Someone here clearly did. It’s even somewhat possible that the message originated offsite (depending on how the list was configured), but one thing I can guarantee — wherever it originated, there was someone on the inside of the company who put time and energy into understanding how to spoof the system to make this work. (without the full headers, I can’t tell more about how this went down, and I’m not sure I particularly want to….)
Will Apple be able to track down the people who did this? Answer: it depends. There are lots of scenarios where they’ll be able to locate the source of the email, even if various aspects of it are spoofed. There are also various ways to avoid that, the simplest being to sneak into someone else’s office when nobody’s around and send it from someone else’s computer, leaving them to explain what happened when the email’s tracked back to it…
In any event — this is really unfortunate, but Apple’s systems are actually quite secure (by design), but there are simply limitations to email that leave itself open to this kind of hack, and if someone has physical access to your network and the time to do some research and experimentation, there’s not a lot anyone can do. This is not a case of a problem in Apple’s systems or technology, but instead, just a really good piece of social engineering and taking advantage of inherent flaws in the email protocols…
And I feel really bad for a bunch of my ex-workmates who’ve probably gone through hell over this and under orders to track the bastards down…
(linked to: list of player’s under contract next year and free agents, plus salary…)
Okay, let me say this right up front. Watching the Wings/Ducks game last night where the Wings beat the Ducks — it made me feel somewhat less irritated at the Sharks going down to Detroit. frankly, if the Wings somehow take down the Ducks in this series, we’ll have to stand back and ask how much of the Sharks loss was Detroit forcing the issue.
But now, having said that…
It’s a few days past the disaster of the second round, and it’s time to take a look at what the Sharks need and how to get there. Unlike last year, I don’t think we can look at it as a learning experience and give the kids a year to grow up. While I think we have some kids who can still grow up and take bigger roles — there’s more here than just a season’s experience.
I think there are two weaknesses to the Sharks team:
1) Until they brought in Bill Guerin, nobody (not one player) had a Stanley Cup ring. No Vinnie Damhousse, no Bob Errey, no veteran to help the players understand what it takes to go deep into the playoffs and make a run. And when we went deep into the playoffs and made a run, I think the team hit the pressure from the other team, backed up and played tentative, especially on the blueline. Detroit turned the knob to 11; San Jose could only find 10. That was really the difference in the series.
2) Our blueline isn’t offensive enough, and when we got on the power play, we simply went into the peripheral and passed it around. No pressure on the slot, no shots from the point. People can point to the Sharks regular season power play as being 2nd in the league, but we have to remember that Wilson had to tinker with it a lot, it was always going hot and cold, and we spent a LOT of time with forwards at the points to compensate.
That second issue leads to a more general question: for all the Sharks ability to develop goaltenders (and we need to see whether that continues now that Strelow has passed on), when was the last time the Sharks developed and offensive defenseman? Sandis Ozolinsh? Andrei Zyuzin? And was Sandis developed so much as a team taught to keep an eye on his back as he randomly did things? (Sandis is a classic example of the kind of player that will generate scoring chances on the ice, you just don’t know which goal they’ll be on in any given shift… and you hope you end up with more offensive than defensive). We’ve had a number of defensemen come up with offensive potential, from Brad Stuart to Mark-Andre Fleury, and they all seem to somehow turn into conservative, stay at home, offensively-passive Dmen.
I find this strange given that the Sharks GM is — Doug Wilson — except that as GM, he’s not strapping on skates and coaching and teaching the kids, Maybe he should.
Instead, at the NHL level, our defensemen are under the care of Rob Zettler. And no offense to Rob, but his forte in the NHL wasn’t shots from the point on the power play.
A huge start at fixing this problem is Craig Rivet; he is my #1 off-season priority, and he needs to be re-signed and kept in San Jose. But I also think we need to consider adding, or replacing, coaching at the AHL and NHL level with some coaching talent that can help develop blueliners offensively — especially given we have Matt Carle and Vlasic needing this tutelage. Rivet can be part of that, but maybe it’s time for Doug to strap them on and coach, too. Or bring in someone new instead of Zettler.
Beyond that, I don’t support changes to coaching or management. I frankly think most of the criticism of Ron Wilson is from fans and media looking for a story to talk about; I don’t buy into it, especially after watching game 1 of Ducks/Wings.
On the other hand, I think we need to make some changes to the team chemistry; It’s just not what we need to take the next step.
So here are my thoughts:
(Murray), TBD, TBD
For the right price:
Needs to be traded:
Needs to be signed:
Needs to be bought out:
If you look at the untouchables, this is a team that’s not far from “done” — I show two roster spots (both 2nd line) up front, two defensive spots, two “black aces” and the backup goalie being question marks. One of those D spots is reserved for Craig Rivet.
On top of that, while I’ve placed Marleau in the “right price” category, my preference is to keep him, and I don’t expect him to be traded. But I think at this point you have to at least ask the question and see what the value is. but in reality, he’ll be the center of the second line.
Griess will step in as backup goalie. That leaves — the 6th defenseman, the third player on Marleau’s line as unknowns, and two pressbox guys. One of those will likely be Setoguchi.
Of the free agents — Rivet, Guerin, Hannan, Davison, et all: love Hannan, but he’s too much like McLaren and will demand too much money. Davison and Murray are variations of the same player: stay at home, physical, really slow, but fi they catch you, you know it. We need to rethink our defense more towards offense and speed, and we don’t need both (or perhaps either, but Murray’s under contract). Ditto Mark Smith — love his grit, but I think it’s time to move on.
Rivet is the only free agent I feel we need to sign, assuming we can. Guerin? If he wants to stay, and if someone can convince me that next season will be more effective for him, sure.
But — look at the roster. See the big, hulking, smoking hole that screwed over the Sharks plans? No? Think back a year; what did the Sharks do? Sign Mark Bell. And they thought, and I’ll be the first to note I agreed with them, that this was a wonderful idea and fixed our needs on the 2nd line.
Then Bell got the DUI, which is still ongoing, came into camp with a bad groin, and the BEST one could say was that towards the end of the season when he finally seemed to get healthy, he improved enough (but — mostly as a third/fourth line banger! not 2nd liner) to turn his season into merely an unmitigated disaster instead of painfully embarassing. I don’t want to hear how he’ll turn it around next year, I don’t want to hear how badly he feels about this. I don’t want to hear how next year will be different. I want to hear that his contract’s been bought out and he won’t be allowed in the locker room in san jose, ever again. The Mark Bell era is so over.
But much of what the Sharks tried to “fix” all season was that hole in the roster where Mark Bell was supposed to be; let’s not blow off the fact that both Wilson’s fought this disaster all season, and never quite sealed it; even bringing in Guerin (and I think Guerin deserves more credit than he’s gotten here, for helping guys like Bernier and Rissmuller take their game to a more consistent and physical level, if not for his scoresheet performance) didn’t quite do it.
So we need to go out into the market and look for a 2nd liner, preferably impact, VERY preferably with a cup ring or three. Proven leadership. Scoring. I’m thinking Briere or Drury or Ryan Smith. It’s why I’m willing to consider trading Marleau and/or Rissmuller if we can bring back the right player as part of a package. Hint: Jeff Friesen is NOT what I consider the right player, not any more. So don’t go there, folks.
It’s also time to trade Toskala; one year left on the contract, Nabokov (love him or hate him, or it seems, simply not quite trust him) is the #1, and deserves to be. I can’t see going into another season with the rotation in goal, and I think we need to free up that asset and turn it into other things. We have holes we need to fill, and Toskala’s got a good value to trade with.
Overall — not much broken. But we’re far from “stay the course”. We still need to solve the “mark bell” problem, we need to sign Rivet, and we have one other defenseman position to deal with — and I think we need to seriously consider bringing in one or more folks who’ve “been there” and can wear their Stanley Cup rings into the locker room every day
And that’s probably enough for Doug Wilson to think about this offseason…
Tom Benjamin’s NHL Weblog: Soon to be the Former:
Rick Westhead apparently has a copy of the report lawyer Chris Paliare completed on the Ted Saskin email scandal. He figures the players will have to pay Saskin about a million bucks to fire him for cause. Since that’s basically his accrued vacation pay, a pension contribution and something called a “surplus fund share”, Paliare seems to be saying the players do have cause to terminate Saskin.
# For conducting a “wholly improper” email surveillance over an extended period of time. “The surveillance was not aimed at protecting the interests of the players. It was not in the interests of the PA. Rather, in purpose and execution the surveillance was principally in aid of Mr. Saskin’s personal interests.”
Saskin got fired today, for cause. The compensation package he’s being given is for things like accrued vacation and his pension plan — not a going away “bonus”. Those are things taht you basically can’t not give him, they’re things earned but not issued before termination.
I have to admit that I felt for a long time that this would blow over, and that it was a small buy noisy group of users that wouldn’t let it die and get over it.
that latter part was true — but it also turns out they were justified, and correct, in not letting it go.
I did want to add one comment on the email surveillance. If you go back to way earlier in all of this, you’ll find some comments from Arturs Irbe (at that time part of the NHLPA group and involved in all of this) saying he was convinced someone was watching the emails, that people on the other side of the NHLPA power struggle were acting on information they had no legitimate way to have access to.
Turns out that Archie was right. And now the NHLPA has to pick up the pieces and rebuild itself (again). I wonder if it makes sense for them to reach outside of hockey for a new leader, perhaps from major league baseball’s union; someone with a strong labor background in sports, and then use the player reps adn management committee to help them understand the issues that are unique to hockey and the NHL. The history of the NHLPA grabbing people from within itself and within the hockey world is, well, a bit spotty.
Time for Conference final predictions.
I was 6 of 8 in the first round.
In the second round, I picked:
I picked San Jose in 6. sigh. whine. moan. grump.
Actually, I said:
Detroit/San Jose: San Jose in 6.
Going to be a fun series, but I think San jose is better. but Detroit worries me if the Sharks falter a bit, and Hasek is, well, Hasek.
Which hit it on the head wonderfully, except for the fun part. the Sharks DID falter, the Red Wings didn’t, and Hasek was, well, very Hasek-like. Damn him, anyway.
Anaheim in 7: thanks to Luongo, it was almost that close.
Buffalo in 6: but congrats to the rangers for a great run.
Ottawa in 6: and New Jersey found it was just not like the good old days, Lou behind the bench or no. Ran out of pixie dust, Lou.
So I ended up 3-4, missing the one series I really wanted to get right. Of course.
So, I’m 9 for 12 for the playoffs, my best run in years.
The two conference finals:
Anaheim/Detroit: Anaheim in 5. Hasek can’t be hasek-like enough to beat the Ducks, and with Schneider out — I don’t know about you, but Chelios playing 25 minutes a game doesn’t worry me, but after seeing him in game 6 against the sharks, Chelios on the power play does. I don’t think this’ll be as close as some people do.
I heard on XM today that one of the ways Chelios stays in shape is that he spends a lot of time on the exercise bike — in a sauna. Holy hyperbaric chambers, Batman, I get heatstroke thinking of watching him…. Kids, do NOT try that at home.
Ottawa/Buffalo: I have very good friends who are senators fans. I very much want to see the Senators move on. The Sabres haven’t shown their best hockey yet (but win). This one can go either way. My heart says Ottawa, my head says buffalo. I’d call it a coin flip, but I can’t, so I’ll pick Buffalo in 7. (now, watch Ottawa sweep…)
News – City Council Approves Upgrades For HP Pavilion – San Jose Sharks:
In a meeting earlier this afternoon, the San Jose City Council voted in favor of the sixteen-and-a-half million dollars worth of proposed improvements to be made at HP Pavilion. The upgrades include a larger scoreboard and sound system that will enhance the experience of the nearly 1.75 million people who attend sporting events, concerts, family shows and other events at HP Pavilion annually.
An artist rendering of the new scoreboard set for installation this summer.Under the agreement, signage around the interior of the Pavilion will be upgraded with LED displays, a new and state-of-the-art center scoreboard will be installed, the sound system and acoustics would be enhanced and the video system will be upgraded to support high-definition.
They’re finally going to fix the sound system and acoustics. Maybe now game announcements will stop sounding like Charlie Brown’s teacher….
Seriously, these are going to be welcome improvements, and I know the Sharks have been planning this for a while, since Greg Jamison and I talked about it prior to the lockout. Part of it came down to this cost being shared with the city since this IS a city building and to date the Sharks have funded almost all capital improvements since opening. And getting the city to share in the improvements had to wait for a mayor with a clue…
The new mayor, Chuck Reed, is clearly going to be more open to working with San Jose and the sports community of the city; he’s grabbed Dean Munro, who was president of the San Jose Sports Authority (the people who work to bring in key sporting events like the NCAA regionals to the city) as one of his key staff guys; Dean’s taken a leave from SJSA for the duration to avoid conflict of interest issues.
(in a side note, since San Jose State nixed the upgrade of the stadium for soccer (STUPID!), the word is now filtering out that they’re looking at the old FMC manufacturing plant land as a possible site for a soccer stadium. that land is at the 880 and Coleman at the end of the runway, so that would be an interesting and practical use of that property…
As of today — there are six teams playing hockey, out of 30.
The Sabres are playing the Rangers in a couple of hours, and may send the rangers packing (or not).
Monday, there’s a very good chance the Sharks will play their last game of the season — Detroit is simply outworking the Sharks, and deserves to win this series. In a series that’s gone 3-2, the team with 3 wins moves on 80% of the time, and to be onest, I’m surprised that statistic isn’t higher.
If the Sharks do go out Monday, or even if they make it to Wednesday, fans will consider this a disappointing end to the season. It will be, too; this team has the capability to go further, but they’ve also shown some weaknesses that fans and team both will be able to spend a lot of time and energy analyzing….
But frankly? I think what we’re seeing has more to do with what Detroit IS doing, and less to do with what San Jose is NOT. That will get lost in the post-series griping, but I wanted to call that out and give the Red Wings some deserved props.
Going into the season, most of us, I think, looked at the Sharks as one of the top 3 teams in the league, along with Buffalo and Anaheim. In reality, they’re part of a group of six that also includes Detroit (no surprise), Ottawa (only a tiny suprise), and New York (very much a surprise).
That’s not bad. It’s not good enough — but it’s not bad. And I figured I’d note just how well they did this year now, because I know (myself included), once they DO lose this series, we’ll be spending too much time griping and pondering to notice the successes much.
Honestly, though, watching the Sharks and Ducks in this playoffs, I don’t think the Sharks would have gotten past them anyway. Anaheim still seems to be coasting a bit. almost scary, but that’s one heck of a team.
And heck, you know? If the Sharks surprise me? I’d love to find out. But right now, Detroit’s clearly playing a better game of hockey than San Jose is. But as we know, in the grand scheme of things, Sharks fans will have to blame either the refs or the Sharks for the loss, and ignore the Wing’s success as a factor… (grin)
Mike Chen’s Hockey Blog: Wavering on OT:
Apparently, the tide is turning on keeping overtime the way it is. I see the logic of going to 4-on-4 — I mean, you keep things in the hands of the teams while freeing up the ice for more plays and more scoring chances which means less nights of crazy game times. And it’s not like players are going all out during their sixth period of hockey; hell, some guys can barely skate at that time. As a West Coaster, I love East Coast insane overtime games because they finish up in the late evening and I can get to bed at a sane time. Going to Sharks home playoff games, there have been many times I specifically thought, “God, I hope this doesn’t go into triple overtime — I have to work tomorrow.” At the same time, though, I’ve never experienced the delirious exhiliration that comes with a home-team triple overtime win (or, thankfully, the sheer depths of hell that comes with a home-team triple overtime loss).
Frankly, I’ve come to think that moving to 4 on 4 starting with the 2nd overtime is a good idea, and Mike sums it up well. Game 4 was a great example — Laurie and I set a curfew as soon as we realized we were going to overtime, because the alarm goes off at 6AM no matter what. I don’t want to go so far as to say we were happy that Detroit won it rather than see the Sharks win in the 2nd or 3rd overtime — but there is some aspect of that.
Now, I love watching overtime games, but they do become more of a test of endurance (for fans as well) than a game of skill. I remember even staying up until some ungodly hour during a trip to Victoria when a Memorial Cup game went five overtimes. Laurie, being the rational one, went to sleep and told me to tell her who won in the morning.
If there’s an argument for NOT doing this, it’s that these long overtime games impact a team’s performance down the road; they tire a team out, suck life out of legs, build up the lactic acid. It’s a part of the fabric that makes the NHL playoff such a touch thing to get through alive for a team. But, honestly, the more I think about it, the more I think that this comes down to “to win the cup, we have to avoid these long overtimes” is not a good reason for having them (and honestly, I think that’s true. If you look at the playoffs, teams that play a lot of OT, and play multi-OT games, struggle to get deeper into the playoffs and win the cup).
Frankly, anything that shuts the door on shoot-outs I’m for, too. Even in the regular season. I’d much rather seem them play 10 minutes of 4-4 in the regular season, just because that’ll reduce the number of shoot-outs significantly. But that won’t happen.
The difference between referee pairings is what gets you,” says Ducks coach Randy Carlyle. “Some guys call everything to the letter, other guys will let them play a little bit. The little touches are often called as restraint and we as hockey people know they have no effect on the game, no effect on your ability to keep skating. But I don’t want to go back to the way the game used to be played either, because I’m telling you, the speed on the bench is greater than it’s ever been.”
Herein lies the disconnect between the players and coaches in the NHL and at least the more traditional spectators who watch their games.
The speed Carlyle describes is certainly not producing any more goals and often not a helluva lot more entertainment either, particularly if you happen to be watching in the West.
How you can get the kind of talent both San Jose and Detroit have in their lineups on the same ice and produce games with so little happening is nothing short of astounding, although that’s more the coaches’ fault than anything else
There’s a basic fallacy to this complaint. That is this: nobody should claim, at least with a straight face, that in the “good old days”, different referees all called things in a league-wide consistent way.
Think back to the days of the one referee system. Remember the time when in three consecutive games, Andy VanHellemond, Paul Stewart and Kerry Fraser came to town and called a game in your building.
Yeah, they all called the games the same way, right? Yeah, right.
No, this is a strawman argument. There IS inconsistency between referees and among referee pairs. There is, IMHO, a lot less than there was in the Good Old Days. But there’s a lot less of that than their used to be.
In fact, what this is is a two-fold complaint: dislike for the emphasis on obstruction fouls, and a fond memory of the “let the boys play” days, when the referees weren’t in fact allowed to referee the game, but were there merely to keep the players from killing each other. Mostly.
The reality is, the league is transitioning from being a league where rules were optional to one where the rules define the game, moving from the “pond hockey” mentality where two teams are fighting over who pays for the keg and it’s all okay unless an ambulance needs to be called, to a real, professional league like the NFL, where something that’s a penalty in the first period is a penalty in the last.
“let the boys play” is code for the good old days, and there’s an old-school group that remembers it fondly, and a new-school group that is seeing how once this transition is done, the game will be better, faster and more interesting.
The difference, by the way, isn’t THAT significant. It’s the difference between “do what it takes to win”, and “do what it takes to win — within the rules”. And one only needs to look at a guy like Chris Chelios to see how players can adapt — and adapt successfully — to the new reality. The high talent players will thrive in it, because they’ll be allowed to.
The new rules are about this league being a first-second line league, not a third-fourth line league.
Do the rules and interpretation need tweaking? yes. Does that mean going back to the Good Old Days to do it? no.
But for the league to succeed, the FIRST thing that needs to happen is for us to all get over the “let the boys play” mentality, because that’s the exact mentality that led to the days of the goon and the agitator, and the 1996 Panthers, which to me was the ultimate form of the monster created by “let the boys play”.
I’m working on some longer essays on this (I had to take a side-trip into doing some research to understand some things better; I realize that’s against the blogger’s rules where opinions matter, not informed ones, but nevermind).
But this is the key message: when “let the boys play” appears, the folks yearning for the Good Old Days are saying they want to go back to the days of the 1985 Oilers or the 1981 Islanders. And that’s a laudible goal (and it’s not coincidental that most of the folks calling for this were in the league at the time).
The problem is — that era died, and was replaced by the late 80′s and 90s — and ultimately the 1996 Panthers. It was killed by guys like Ryan Holliweg and Essa Tikkanen and Darius Kasparitis, and coaches like Scotty Bowman and Roger Neilsen and Lou Lamoriello, who understood that “let the boys play” gave them options that let them not have to out-skate Wayne and Mario, but merely grab on and pull those guys back to the pack.
The new rules are designed to force teams to get better, not merely prevent the other team from being better. And it’s working.
The problem (or perhaps “problem” is more appropriate) with scoring in the playoffs this year isn’t the new rules or the refereeing. It’s that the goaltending is do damn good. No offense to Grant Fuhr or Bernie Parent, but how would the 1981 islanders have fared against Roberto Luongo last night? AND HE LOST that series.
More on this, hopefully soon. But for now, realize this for what it is: a war for control of the game between two philosophical factions, those who want to go back to the “pond hockey” mentality (but refuse to understand that this is what lead to the 1996 Panthers), and those who are trying to move the game forward. The funny thing is, what the “let the boys play” group wants is not incompatible with where the league is trying to go. But they’re too involved with their fond remembrance of the Good Old Days to remember all of the bad stuff that went along with the parts they want to remember….
(*hat tip: kukla)