Comments on: Truncated RSS Feeds Kill Conversations and Long Term Traffic: Technology Evangelist http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/ Typing Without A Net Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:24:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Chuqui 3.0.1 Beta http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1472 Chuqui 3.0.1 Beta Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:07:59 +0000 http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/#comment-1472 <strong>followup: Truncated RSS Feeds Kill Conversations and Long Term Traffic: Technology Evangelist</strong> Chuqui 3.0.1 Beta: Truncated RSS Feeds Kill Conversations and Long Term Traffic: Technology Evangelist: So, I want to toss this out. Once you decide you really need to monetize that feed, what's the way to do it? I personally dislike ads in an RSS feed... followup: Truncated RSS Feeds Kill Conversations and Long Term Traffic: Technology Evangelist

Chuqui 3.0.1 Beta: Truncated RSS Feeds Kill Conversations and Long Term Traffic: Technology Evangelist: So, I want to toss this out. Once you decide you really need to monetize that feed, what’s the way to do it? I personally dislike ads in an RSS feed…

]]> By: Jay Neely http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1467 Jay Neely Fri, 27 Jul 2007 03:05:18 +0000 http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/#comment-1467 I almost always read feeds in bulk, skimming them, and then opening any entries that interest me in a new tab. So publishing a full feed doesn't necessarily mean people won't click through to the site. The best way to make certain people come to your site is to make certain it offers something more than just your entries and a pretty design. I almost always read feeds in bulk, skimming them, and then opening any entries that interest me in a new tab. So publishing a full feed doesn’t necessarily mean people won’t click through to the site.
The best way to make certain people come to your site is to make certain it offers something more than just your entries and a pretty design.

]]> By: Wayne Elgin http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1468 Wayne Elgin Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:46:16 +0000 http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/#comment-1468 Why is neither "not necessarily viable?" The original article you link to provides a very strong case that it is, in fact, viable and put into practice on a large number of feeds. Sure, nothing's free, but RSS is very close to it for both parties. You can't ignore the value of pushing your content (which is your product) and exposing more people to the quality of it, thereby generating more trackbacks. I'm not the only one in the world who is bothered by the arrogance of truncated feeds (Fark is one notable exception) and immediately unsubscribes from them. Lesser of two evils is naturally ads inserted in feeds, but the best for consumer and producer in the long-term is no restrictions on information, as everyone benefits from freely available information. Why is neither “not necessarily viable?” The original article you link to provides a very strong case that it is, in fact, viable and put into practice on a large number of feeds. Sure, nothing’s free, but RSS is very close to it for both parties. You can’t ignore the value of pushing your content (which is your product) and exposing more people to the quality of it, thereby generating more trackbacks. I’m not the only one in the world who is bothered by the arrogance of truncated feeds (Fark is one notable exception) and immediately unsubscribes from them. Lesser of two evils is naturally ads inserted in feeds, but the best for consumer and producer in the long-term is no restrictions on information, as everyone benefits from freely available information.

]]> By: jason kirk http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1469 jason kirk Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:26:09 +0000 http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/#comment-1469 i GREATLY prefer to see small ads in my reader than have to deal with truncation. i GREATLY prefer to see small ads in my reader than have to deal with truncation.

]]> By: Mike http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1470 Mike Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:45:45 +0000 http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/#comment-1470 I do a lot of rading offline (such as on Caltrain or when flying), so partial feeds become a show-stopper. If the whole post is in my reader, I can actually finish postings Full feeds give me more control over how I do my reading. I do a lot of rading offline (such as on Caltrain or when flying), so partial feeds become a show-stopper. If the whole post is in my reader, I can actually finish postings
Full feeds give me more control over how I do my reading.

]]> By: Ric http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/comment-page-1/#comment-1471 Ric Thu, 26 Jul 2007 01:40:48 +0000 http://www.chuqui.com/2007/07/truncated-rss-feeds-kill-conversations-and-long-term-traffic-technology-evangelist/#comment-1471 You're right - it's a "lesser of two evils" thing, with no perfect answer. My own behaviour: I have removed some feeds from my reader that only publish partial feeds, and refused to subscribe to new feeds from "old friends" because they now use partial feeds. I have stayed subscribed to full feeds that have ads inserted. The guy I didn't follow to a new feed suggested that I could (and I do) ignore the ads - but my objection is not the ads, but the having to click again just to get past the teaser (and it's even worse when you then have to visit multiple pages to see the whole thing - that's REALLY crass!). As you can see (I read you via feed), I DO still visit when I feel I have something to contribute to the conversation, or occasionally jsut to remind myself what the site looks like, and check the blogroll and other items of interest. But when you follow more than a couple of blogs, having to click-through starts getting second-hand. You’re right – it’s a “lesser of two evils” thing, with no perfect answer. My own behaviour: I have removed some feeds from my reader that only publish partial feeds, and refused to subscribe to new feeds from “old friends” because they now use partial feeds. I have stayed subscribed to full feeds that have ads inserted.
The guy I didn’t follow to a new feed suggested that I could (and I do) ignore the ads – but my objection is not the ads, but the having to click again just to get past the teaser (and it’s even worse when you then have to visit multiple pages to see the whole thing – that’s REALLY crass!). As you can see (I read you via feed), I DO still visit when I feel I have something to contribute to the conversation, or occasionally jsut to remind myself what the site looks like, and check the blogroll and other items of interest. But when you follow more than a couple of blogs, having to click-through starts getting second-hand.

]]>