Sharks live to play another game.

And now we go to game 6.

Well, if it happens, losing in six is a lot less embarassing than losing in four; I’m sure there’s a contingent that’ll focus on the problems, because that’s what they do, and ignor ethe positives, because it’s a lot more fun to whine (for them).

We had a pair of those behind us for game 5, and oh, man. It ogt painful after a while, made me miss old Rat-basher’s falsetto. They actually were there to celebrate the Sharks loss, as far as we could tell: not pro-Dallas, but anti-San jose. As the Sharks gave up 2 in the 2nd and went down 2-0, boy, did the invective (and fracks) fly. and more amusingly, as the Sharks rallied and came back, they got even more pissed. They reminded me mostly of those weird Nascar nuts that go to the races hoping for nasty crashes.

Even funkier, as soon as Pavelski scored the OT winner, we got one last round of cussing, and they stood up and literally ran for the exits. The entire arena exploded in noise and cheering, and they were pissed, and leaving like they were afraid someone might hit them. Well, a good chunk of the section around them was probably considering it, actually.

Their primary whipping boy, Christian “Errorhoff”, who, from their comments, played such a rotten game that on at least ten shifts they declared that it was his last shift of the game and Wilson was going to bench him. (hint: Errhoff played 18 minutes and was on the ice for the last minute of the 3rd period…)

God, if I ever start sounding like that, someone shoot me.

Speaking of whining, there’s always Daryl Reaugh:

Dallas Stars Blog:: KICKED IN THE CASH AND PRIZES?!:


To me this is known as kinetic motion – not kicking motion.

I mean my god, I guess according to the league’s definition we all make one kicking motion after another as mere pedestrians.

Maybe its time for the NHL to add intent to the definition — as in, “He intended to kick the puck.” And then rely on their intelligent arbiters and video reviewers to differentiate. I agree, that’s a stretch.

But truth be told, that call didn’t sink the Stars in Game 5. Egregious defensive zone errors coupled with sniper -accurate capitalization cost the Stars Game 5. Errors that better be cleaned up prior to Game 6 or else we’ll be prepping for a Game 7.

who is an announcer I really like listening to, but man…

fortunately, on the other side, there’s Jamie Baker. Maybe Daryl ought to read Jamie’s blog, so he can figure out what’s going on here…

San Jose Sharks -> Morrow’s Disallowed Goals:


Brendan Morrow and everyone affiliated with or cheering for the Dallas Stars is going to say they got robbed of a goal tonight on Morrow’s first disallowed goal. I am going to give a technical analysis of why the goal was disallowed and why it was the correct call. But first lets clear up a few other things.

I love hearing all of the whining out of Dallas. Morrow’s quotes show a level of anger and frustration that only benefits the sharks. If he’s pissed at the reffing, he’s not focussing on winning the game. I’ll take that, Brendan.

So, what did I see in game 5?

It’s my belief that the big difference between the Sharks and the Stars in this series is the Calgary Flames. The Stars got a few days rest; the Sharks played their butt off to beat the Flames and immediately turned around and started a series with the Stars.

Sunday will be the Sharks 13th game in the playoffs, in only 25 days. The Stars got one extra day off between series. Physiology kicks in here: it takes time to flush the lactic acid from the legs and restock the glyocgen. When you’re pushing your body as hard as these teams are, an extra day of rest is huge.

And that’s what I saw in the first couple of games: Sharks fading in the third, a sign of exhaustion and dead legs. the Stars simply had a little more in the tank, enough to turn the tide. And in game 4 and 5? You start seeing the tired legs evening out. In game 5, in fact, the Stars showed that third period fade; any advantage they had in the start of the series is gone — and without that advantage, now things have turned back towards the Sharks a bit.

the Sharks in game 5 played a canny, possession-centric game. the Stars made a big push in the 2nd, but even so, the sharks hit a post and came close a number of times. Two goals got called back (I appreciate Jamie’s analysis of the callback; I tend to agree with Reaugh about the rule — but I go in the opposite direction, and I’d make any puck that hits the skate or boot a non-goal and take the intent or motion analysis out of the game. That game could well have been 4-0 stars, but it could also have been 2-1 sharks after 2 just as easily.

And in the third, you saw the Stars fade, their legs show that tired look. Tongues hanging a bit, shifts get shorter. they’re hitting that glycogen wall, too, and the Sharks seemed able to dig deeper late and rally back.

The series is THAT close. Every game turns on two or three key plays. In the first three, those plays went to the Stars. In the last two, the Sharks. Now, the Stars have gone from “we just need to close out this series” to “if we don’t win game 6, it’s back to San Jose for a crapshoot”. and suddenly, they’ve lost two in a row, and have “bad reffing” in their heads. These are not good things for a team trying to close out a series.

Having said that — odds still favor the Stars, and will for the rest of the series. San Jose is definitely back in it; but you can’t consider them a favorite. Or even money, even.

But heck, at this point, I think they answered the critics. Not that the critics will listen…. they’re too busy looking for reasons to criticize. It’s what they do.

The folks looking to rip the Sharks or fire wilson or blame Errorhoff and Marleau won’t want to admit it, but this is a coin-flip series. Every game has basically been a coin-flip. and it doesn’t matter if the Sharks went out in game 4 or game 7, it was still a bunch of coin flips. And yes, you can lose 4 straight coinflips and not have it your fault…

Onward to Dallas, where I expect Dallas to have some ghosts hanging around. It’s going to come down to how well they handle the ghosts. I think we know what San Jose is going to bring, nad it’s going to be whether Dallas can rise above that or not. One could say that’s all about character and a coin flip…

You might also want to read:

  1. Sharks after game 2. Now what? I’ve been pondering what to do with the Sharks after game 2, what they need to do after what happened in Vancouver. Part of me...
  2. A quick comment on the Sharks/Capitals game (and Sharks hall of fame ramblings) I can only think of one thing to say about tonight’s game against the Capitals: LOOK! A PUPPY! (seriously, Sharks didn’t look terrible; a step...
  3. Was the Sharks/Bruins game a statement game? So was the Sharks/Bruins game last night a statement game? I think it was, sort of. But not as much as some are making it...
  4. Sharks Hockey Odyssey: 5/7 WCSF Game 6: detroit 2, SHARKS 0 Sharks Hockey Odyssey: 5/7 WCSF Game 6: detroit 2, SHARKS 0: The Teal, who were just 33 seconds from leaving 525 W. Santa Clara with...
  5. ESPN.com – NHL/PLAYOFFS2007 – Sharks coach bites back, mulls series’ rough play ESPN.com – NHL/PLAYOFFS2007 – Sharks coach bites back, mulls series’ rough play: Ron Wilson has no idea what playoff series Barry Trotz has been watching....

  • Mike

    Josh, you make some interesting points. I like Ron Wilson and am inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt, but your comment is definitely food for thought.
    I agree with your comments on resiliency. As things got tough, this year the Sharks played better. Even in OT, the Sharks were controlling the puck quite a bit in the OT (except for the first OT).
    Game six shows just exactly why so few teams have came back from an 0-3 deficit. The Sharks played their guts out but didn’t get the right break at the right time. The season ends because there was no margin of error after losing the first three.
    I compare the Dallas series to a set of coin tosses where the Sharks came up with tails four times. It is hard for me to be too upset at it when I think of it that way. The teams were way more evenly matched than I would have predicted. I must say Dallas made very few mistakes and had very few long stretches of shaky play. When they did, Turco was there.
    It remains to be seen how much the Stars have left after this series. This ended up being the best of the second round series…something I would not have predicted after the first three games.
    I’m sure there will be some changes. The same fans who were chanting “sign him” after Campbell’s spin-o-rama goal against Montreal are dumping all over him on the Mercury News chat. I’d like to see Campbell back because he brings an element to the team that has been sorely lacking. He did fade in the playoffs, but I suspect the travel demands probably caught up to him. Buffalo never had to go back and forth across multiple time zones and then play back-to-back.
    I’m also glad that Marleau had a strong playoffs after the shaky first half of the season.

  • Josh

    Having had a week or so to reflect on the likely demise following the 0-3 hole, and watch the resilance shown (this edition of the Sharks didn’t just roll over and die) I no longer think they need to blow up the team. I do think they need to change coaches. Not for the wild reasons that the “haters” give. Fundamentally, there seems to be a disconnect between the team Doug is trying to build, and the way Ron wants to play. Doug has built a fast, big, and skilled core of youth and veterans. Ron, meanwhile, is coaching like he’s got a group of guys that are int he NHL because they can execute a system flawlessly.
    The thing is, the Sharks are not New Jersey or Minnesota. That’s not how they are built to succeed. There are lots of examples of this, not the least of which is Brian Campbell and Milan Michalek both looking lost and like they were thinking instead of using their much better hockey instincts, but even at its best, other teams havn’t had to neutralize the Sharks speed because the Sharks do it to themselves. With the speed and size the Sharks have, their defense philosophy should be to attack the puck and force turnovers… Calgary plays this way, and they don’t have near the depth of speed nor the skill to make it work like the Sharks do. Turnovers lead to open ice and transition, which would let the Sharks use their speed and skill to score goals. Instead the sit back in a passive box, and wait on teams. Because of this, other teams tend to be set when they try to break out. For all the speed, the Sharks rarely manage to show it in attacks. That’s coaching. The Sharks ought to be playing a style that uses their strengths. The Sharks are not built as a 2-1 team, they are built as a 5-3 or 4-2 type of team, with the occasional 8-2 thrown in there. I actually like Ron Wilson, and believe he’ll be a good coach elsewhere, but the Sharks are just not a team built to his style of coaching.

  • Mike

    Oh my, that was a painful way to lose the series.
    I have no complaints. This was a memorable series and we came out on the wrong end.
    Even if we had won after 4OT and again in game , I doubt we would have had enough left to make any significant noise against Detroit.
    The Sharks “left it all on the ice” tonight.