<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the new Macbooks — and the circus that preceded them…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/</link>
	<description>Typing Without A Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/comment-page-1/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>Well, as you can read in the forums, a lot of people with Firewire videocamera&#039;s use the Macbook because the formfactor. If Apple is saying, if you own a Firewirecamera, you must buy as a pro, I think they make a mistake. If they want to make up, why not make a 13&#039; MBPro? Would make more sence for the roadwarriors. Thanks for responding, by the way.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as you can read in the forums, a lot of people with Firewire videocamera&#8217;s use the Macbook because the formfactor. If Apple is saying, if you own a Firewirecamera, you must buy as a pro, I think they make a mistake. If they want to make up, why not make a 13&#8242; MBPro? Would make more sence for the roadwarriors. Thanks for responding, by the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flip</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/comment-page-1/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Flip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/#comment-956</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget in the last financials release there was a comment from Apple about lower margins in the next product release.
That had a hand in people expecting cheaper products.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget in the last financials release there was a comment from Apple about lower margins in the next product release.<br />
That had a hand in people expecting cheaper products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/comment-page-1/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/#comment-957</guid>
		<description>In regards to the cheaper laptop bit: Why would Apple lower the price? They already stated that they&#039;ve matched last years sales and for every three dollars spent on computers $1 is Apple. So lets lower the price for what?
Consumer A is already thinking about getting a Mac. They are already willing to fork out $n for one. Why lower the price? Will Consumer A buy it sooner? Maybe, but it might still be within the same quarter so that sale still happens then. But that still doesn&#039;t change the fact that Consumer A is still WILLING to buy it at the current price.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to the cheaper laptop bit: Why would Apple lower the price? They already stated that they&#8217;ve matched last years sales and for every three dollars spent on computers $1 is Apple. So lets lower the price for what?<br />
Consumer A is already thinking about getting a Mac. They are already willing to fork out $n for one. Why lower the price? Will Consumer A buy it sooner? Maybe, but it might still be within the same quarter so that sale still happens then. But that still doesn&#8217;t change the fact that Consumer A is still WILLING to buy it at the current price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fazal Majid</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/comment-page-1/#comment-958</link>
		<dc:creator>Fazal Majid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/#comment-958</guid>
		<description>I just got the aluminum MacBook for my future in-laws in London to use as a videoconferencing terminal.
I myself downgraded from a 15&quot; MBP to a MacBook Air SSD 8 months ago (my primary computer is a desktop). I miss the Gigabit Ethernet, but not the Firewire. I don&#039;t think Firewire/USB/eSATA drives cut it nowadays and use a home-grown Solaris NAS for my storage needs. I would have considered upgrading to the new Air if it had 4GB of RAM, but I guess we&#039;ll just have to wait for the next generation.
As for the screen size issue, the combination of a MacBook with a 24&quot; LED Cinema Display compares favorably with the MacBook Pro.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got the aluminum MacBook for my future in-laws in London to use as a videoconferencing terminal.<br />
I myself downgraded from a 15&#8243; MBP to a MacBook Air SSD 8 months ago (my primary computer is a desktop). I miss the Gigabit Ethernet, but not the Firewire. I don&#8217;t think Firewire/USB/eSATA drives cut it nowadays and use a home-grown Solaris NAS for my storage needs. I would have considered upgrading to the new Air if it had 4GB of RAM, but I guess we&#8217;ll just have to wait for the next generation.<br />
As for the screen size issue, the combination of a MacBook with a 24&#8243; LED Cinema Display compares favorably with the MacBook Pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/comment-page-1/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/2008/10/thoughts-on-the-new-macbooks-and-the-circus-that-preceded-them/#comment-959</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised at the level of disappointment over FireWire.  I doubt FireWire ever would have been in the iBook/MacBook line if it wasn&#039;t for FireWire-based iPods.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised at the level of disappointment over FireWire.  I doubt FireWire ever would have been in the iBook/MacBook line if it wasn&#8217;t for FireWire-based iPods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: www.chuqui.com @ 2012-02-11 10:13:36 -->
