<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some more thoughts on backups.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuqui.com/2009/11/some-more-thoughts-on-backups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2009/11/some-more-thoughts-on-backups/</link>
	<description>I&#039;ll keep reinventing myself until I get it right. (3.2 2009-11-21)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 03:31:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MacRat</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2009/11/some-more-thoughts-on-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>MacRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=4951#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>&quot;firewire is gone from the lower end computers&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Only 1 low end Mac, the MacBook. and 1 high end, MacBook Air.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;MacBook: no firewire&lt;br&gt;MacBook Air: no firewire&lt;br&gt;13&quot; MacBook Pro: FW800&lt;br&gt;15&quot; MacBook Pro: FW800&lt;br&gt;17&quot; MacBook Pro: FW800&lt;br&gt;21&quot; iMac: FW800&lt;br&gt;27&quot; iMac: FW800&lt;br&gt;Mac mini: FW800&lt;br&gt;Mac Pro: FW800 (four ports)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While Apple has taken it out of the thin laptops, I don&#039;t see this as a sign of dumping Firewire.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Steve could decide to can it at any time, but I hope not as I don&#039;t see USB 3 being able to handle what me and my users can do with firewire 400 &amp; 800 today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;firewire is gone from the lower end computers&#8221;</p>
<p>Only 1 low end Mac, the MacBook. and 1 high end, MacBook Air.</p>
<p>MacBook: no firewire<br />MacBook Air: no firewire<br />13&#8243; MacBook Pro: FW800<br />15&#8243; MacBook Pro: FW800<br />17&#8243; MacBook Pro: FW800<br />21&#8243; iMac: FW800<br />27&#8243; iMac: FW800<br />Mac mini: FW800<br />Mac Pro: FW800 (four ports)</p>
<p>While Apple has taken it out of the thin laptops, I don&#39;t see this as a sign of dumping Firewire.</p>
<p>Steve could decide to can it at any time, but I hope not as I don&#39;t see USB 3 being able to handle what me and my users can do with firewire 400 &#038; 800 today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuqui</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2009/11/some-more-thoughts-on-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-3162</link>
		<dc:creator>chuqui</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=4951#comment-3162</guid>
		<description>If Apple supports Firewire in future computers. That&#039;s my worry; firewire is gone from the lower end computers. Will it still be supported in higher end computers down the road? Maybe. USB will. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For backups, the extra speed is simply not an issue for me. The cost of adding in a firewire (and/or on top of that a Firewire 800) interface is. All things being equal, I&#039;d rather have all of the interfaces and I&#039;ll use the one that&#039;s fastest and most convenient. For long-term compatibility, for ease of use (plug into the USB hub and forget) and for cost, USB&#039;s better solution for backups. And given apple&#039;s already removed firewire from some units, I don&#039;t expect you&#039;ll see it return on the low end computers at all, so it&#039;s not going to be an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple supports Firewire in future computers. That&#39;s my worry; firewire is gone from the lower end computers. Will it still be supported in higher end computers down the road? Maybe. USB will. </p>
<p>For backups, the extra speed is simply not an issue for me. The cost of adding in a firewire (and/or on top of that a Firewire 800) interface is. All things being equal, I&#39;d rather have all of the interfaces and I&#39;ll use the one that&#39;s fastest and most convenient. For long-term compatibility, for ease of use (plug into the USB hub and forget) and for cost, USB&#39;s better solution for backups. And given apple&#39;s already removed firewire from some units, I don&#39;t expect you&#39;ll see it return on the low end computers at all, so it&#39;s not going to be an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacRat</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2009/11/some-more-thoughts-on-backups/comment-page-1/#comment-3161</link>
		<dc:creator>MacRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=4951#comment-3161</guid>
		<description>Invest in FW400 when FW800 is faster?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is also the future planning that all the FW800 cabling is directly compatible with FW3200. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And yes, I&#039;m looking forward to daisy chaining FW3200 devices just as I do today with FW800 devices. Which you can&#039;t do with USB or eSATA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Invest in FW400 when FW800 is faster?</p>
<p>There is also the future planning that all the FW800 cabling is directly compatible with FW3200. </p>
<p>And yes, I&#39;m looking forward to daisy chaining FW3200 devices just as I do today with FW800 devices. Which you can&#39;t do with USB or eSATA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
