And the Sharks go golfing….

 Trying to put this loss in context. It didn’t hit me as hard as some years, because I fully expected it, but still, this Sharks team shouldn’t be going out in the first round.

Dave Pollak at the Merc has an interesting perspective:

Aftermath of a record-early elimination: Sharks waiting till Tuesday to pack things up for the season | Working the Corners:

Five games. Every other first-round exit lasted six. Until Saturday night’s 3-1 loss to the St. Louis Blues, who won their first playoff series since 2002.

Think about that for a second. Since St. Louis last won a series, the Sharks — a franchise 25 years younger — have won nine.

That isn’t a defense of the team’s management in the wake of a very disappointing 2011-12 season. Just a statement of fact to put things in context.

The reality is, every year one team wins the Stanley Cup and twenty-nine do not. the Sharks are in their twenties, but if you stop and think about it, if the Cup were rotated to each team one per year (like the All-Star game is), the Sharks wouldn’t have had their time with it. Objectively, there’s still a few years to go before they are “late” to the Cup. 

Sports and sports fandom, however, are not objective things. That’s not how fans think. Nor should they. So when a team falls short, it hurts. When you look at a team and you wonder if it’s peaked and the window is closing, it hurts. But in sports, sometimes you do your best, and it’s not enough. 

Was this season this team’s best? Honestly, no. It struggled to get on a roll all year. But this first round against the Blues? I don’t have many complaints. I don’t think the Sharks lost this series, they were beaten. 

I also don’t think the Sharks “fell back” much, either. I think what we’re seeing is a league where many teams are making strong positive moves in their talent and execution. This is parity, and I like it. there are 25 teams capable of making the playoffs and not being embarrassed being there. 

Take a step back and think about it. Which team would you rather be a fan of: the Sharks, who haven’t won a Cup yet, but have been in the playoffs consistently and played deep into the playoffs a number of times — or the Florida Panthers, who ran to the Stanley Cup in 1996, and didn’t make the playoffs again for a decade? or the Blues, another team that’s been out of the playoffs for years that’s now back in the mix?

Would you really put up with a decade of cheering on the Islanders for one Cup? 

Not me. 

Of course, I want both. But honestly, if I can’t have both, the Sharks have done a good job of keeping me entertained. 

So for me, I’m disappointed, but life moves on. I know some fans and media types like to whine about parity) and those whines get louder and more insistent the closer you get to cities like New York or Detroit where there’s this sense of entitlement that of course they should win every year) — but it’s good for hockey, good for the league, and fun to watch. 

That doesn’t mean the Sharks can or should stand pat. I’m thinking through what changes I think are necessary, and a post mortem is coming. But I own’t be burning my jersey in protest. Instead, I think I’ll sit down and watch the Bruins game… 

This entry was posted in Sports - Hockey. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
  • John

    I am glad Chuq is taking time to reflect on the ‘post mortem’ same can’t be said for Tim Kawakami as he is calling for Marleau’s head! A possible starting point is to arm coach Todd with more experience behind the bench by upgrading associate coaches Jay and Matt. Their inexperience showed with less than satisfactory pk and pp systems.

    The usual roster changes.  A chance Boyle, Murray or Clowe are casualities.  I would think DW deserves another crack at making the tweaks.  Todd can stay another year.  

    • http://www.chuqui.com chuqui

      thanks. Boyle, Murray and Clowe are three on my “do not touch” list, along with Thornton, Pavelski, Couture, Vlasic and (I think) Brent Burns. The return needed to convince me to do a roster shakeup involving those players would be immense. Everyone else? WE’ll see. And the reality is, this roster is aging, and we need to focus on the future around pavelski and vlasic and couture more, and thornton and marleau less… 

  • http://twitter.com/chuckgoolsbee chuck goolsbee

    Try being a Canuck fan…

    • http://www.chuqui.com chuqui

      I was, for about one game after the Sharks got eliminated. Now, I’m a hawks fan, at least for another few hours (but I’m not hopeful). After that, I’ll probably be a Blues fan.

    • http://twitter.com/makfan Michael Mathews

      Canucks are my second team, so ouch.

  • http://twitter.com/makfan Michael Mathews

    Interesting article by Purdy. While I don’t agree with all of his conclusions, it was interesting to read that maybe nobody is really evaluating Wilson from year to year under the current ownership group.

    • http://www.chuqui.com chuqui

      I’m still thinking through my post mortem, but I don’t see Doug Wilson or Coach McClellan on the hook this season. I also don’t see that either one should feel that to be true next season. And I’m unconvinced that we have the right coaching mix. But lots to ponder, and I’m still not sure about some of it.

  • http://twitter.com/makfan Michael Mathews

    The only thing that bugs me is how much the luck of the draw factors in. It still seems like if there’s a team you can’t beat in a 7 game series you don’t deserve the cup. Somehow having the seedings line up so that you avoid that team is not something anybody can really control.
    Oh well, I agree on your point about having entertaining competitive hockey. I would hate to have a perennial also ran except for one good year.

    • http://www.chuqui.com chuqui

      I tend to argue that these things are all about luck; but that the better teams tend to put themselves in position to create luck, or to work themselves through the bad bounces. Marginal teams get killed by bad luck, good teams find a way past it.