<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking different about the next Mac Pro (and the rest of Apple&#8217;s desktop line)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuqui.com/2012/09/thinking-different-about-the-next-mac-pro-and-the-rest-of-apples-desktop-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2012/09/thinking-different-about-the-next-mac-pro-and-the-rest-of-apples-desktop-line/</link>
	<description>Stories Told Here</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 22:23:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2012/09/thinking-different-about-the-next-mac-pro-and-the-rest-of-apples-desktop-line/#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>James Sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=18009#comment-2056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell do an &quot;all in one&quot; option with a mini case attached to the monitor stand - not quite as sleek as the iMac of course, but a wider, flatter Mac Mini could well attach to the back of the monitor with good results. More or less a MacBook (Air) motherboard, repackaged. In fact, if it used the power+Thunderbolt connector the current displays have, the computer part wouldn&#039;t need other ports: it could be a thin flat insert between the mount and the monitor itself.

Having said that, Apple seem to be heading in exactly the opposite direction: rather than efficient and flexible modular options, increasingly sealed units with almost no upgrade potential: soldering both storage and RAM in place, now, as well as the battery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dell do an &#8220;all in one&#8221; option with a mini case attached to the monitor stand &#8211; not quite as sleek as the iMac of course, but a wider, flatter Mac Mini could well attach to the back of the monitor with good results. More or less a MacBook (Air) motherboard, repackaged. In fact, if it used the power+Thunderbolt connector the current displays have, the computer part wouldn&#8217;t need other ports: it could be a thin flat insert between the mount and the monitor itself.</p>
<p>Having said that, Apple seem to be heading in exactly the opposite direction: rather than efficient and flexible modular options, increasingly sealed units with almost no upgrade potential: soldering both storage and RAM in place, now, as well as the battery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toke Lahti</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2012/09/thinking-different-about-the-next-mac-pro-and-the-rest-of-apples-desktop-line/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>Toke Lahti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=18009#comment-2012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t know why PCIe slots exist?
If you want to have same bandwidth to your headless desktop (=mac mini) or iMac, you need 8 TB sockets. If next MP will adopt PCIe 3.0 like all other workstations already have, you&#039;d need 16 TB sockets. &quot;One form factor, multiple price/performance points&quot; will then mean quite a bit bigger form factor for mac mini.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t know why PCIe slots exist?<br />
If you want to have same bandwidth to your headless desktop (=mac mini) or iMac, you need 8 TB sockets. If next MP will adopt PCIe 3.0 like all other workstations already have, you&#8217;d need 16 TB sockets. &#8220;One form factor, multiple price/performance points&#8221; will then mean quite a bit bigger form factor for mac mini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Schollnick</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2012/09/thinking-different-about-the-next-mac-pro-and-the-rest-of-apples-desktop-line/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Schollnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=18009#comment-2005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with MacRat.  I&#039;ve toyed with this idea myself... It doesn&#039;t make sense these days for the Mac Pro to be such a large enclosure.  How many people really use more than an expansion slot or two?  Or a drive or two?  Make a small form factor, and then have a separate thunderbolt PCI expansion bus case.  Hook up a Thunderbolt hard drive enclosure for more drive storage.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with MacRat.  I&#8217;ve toyed with this idea myself&#8230; It doesn&#8217;t make sense these days for the Mac Pro to be such a large enclosure.  How many people really use more than an expansion slot or two?  Or a drive or two?  Make a small form factor, and then have a separate thunderbolt PCI expansion bus case.  Hook up a Thunderbolt hard drive enclosure for more drive storage.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacRat</title>
		<link>http://www.chuqui.com/2012/09/thinking-different-about-the-next-mac-pro-and-the-rest-of-apples-desktop-line/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>MacRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuqui.com/?p=18009#comment-2002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As soon as Thunderbolt came out, I wondered if Apple would design a &quot;Mac mini Pro&quot; that focuses on the CPU performance and then leave the storage and PCI slots to separate Thunderbolt boxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as Thunderbolt came out, I wondered if Apple would design a &#8220;Mac mini Pro&#8221; that focuses on the CPU performance and then leave the storage and PCI slots to separate Thunderbolt boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.chuqui.com @ 2013-05-19 00:59:17 by W3 Total Cache -->