Least Sandpiper

Least Sandpiper

Least Sandpiper, Don Edwards Educational Center, Alviso, California

Posted in Photography - Birds, Photography - Portfolio Shots

More than you probably want to know about WordPress RSS Feeds

Based on the feedback I got on yesterday’s note about switching from full-text RSS feeds, I’ve spent the evening looking into this. 

The short answer: you all are right, the summary (aka excerpted) feeds look like absolute dog barf. This has me grumpy. This is also a feature, not a bug. It’s how WordPress does it. I did in fact fix a minor bug in the RSS feeds that was making the HTML incorrect, but that wasn’t the cause of this or anything anyone but an HTML geek would notice (but it’s now fixed, too).

Here’s the problem. the WordPress default RSS generator handles full feeds as if it was publishing the articles, and it includes the HTML formatting and so the feeds look reasonable. When you switch to the summary feeds, WordPress strips all of the HTML out of the feed and spits out a sanitized hunk o’ text. 

This seems stupid, but unfortunately, there’s a reason for it: since a summary feed is only publishing a subset of the article and is editing it by chopping off the end, the chances that what it tries to publish is legal and valid HTML is effectively nil. To do this properly you would need to parse the article out enough to be able to clean up the HTML and make sure whatever is stuffed into the feed isn’t corrupted. 

That’s a problem. I understand why WordPress made this decision — but for me, it’s frustrating. This decision isn’t as important if you use a default summary feed with a small number of words in each excerpt. When I tried to switch to summary feeds with longer summaries, that just runs into this assumption about stripping HTML and leaves the feed a large, gloppy mess. 

One of the nice things about hacking WordPress is that normally, any problem you run into a dozen geeks have run into first and you can find half a dozen options to solve it. Not this time. Which probably means anyone who’s run into this so far has simply said “bugger it” and turned full feeds back on. Either that, or there’s a different solution I haven’t found yet (but I’m guessing it’s “bugger it”). 

It would be possible to write an RSS feed generator that both preserves valid HTML and excerpts the content. Nobody I can find has done that to date. It looks like a fair bit of work, even hacking on the existing code as a starting point. I did try turning off the filtering and immediately started seeing broken feeds, so that’s not an option. 

I do have a couple of ideas I want to explore that may lead to solutions, but there’s no “quick fix” that allows both summary feeds and readable ones, not using extended (250 word) excerpts. 

Because of this, I’ve said “bugger it” and turned full RSS feeds back on — for now. I don’t want people to have to live with the crappy summary feeds unless I decide I have no better option. As long as I’m exploring those options, I’ll leave the full feed on.

If I can’t solve this to my satisfaction I’ll have to make a choice whether the problems of publishing full feeds are outweighed by the problems of publishing crappy-looking summary feeds or not. I reserve the opportunity to turn them back on down the road. 

So for now? Back to what it was. Only a bit grumpier to be caught by this little WordPress surprise. Sorry to surprise you with it, also; I didn’t realize the shift was going to disrupt the feed this significantly. 

Live and learn… 

Posted in Working on Web Sites

Things You’ll Find Interesting March 26, 2013

Here are some items I found today that I thought you’d find interesting:

Posted in Things You'll Find Interesting

A change to the RSS feeds

I wanted to call this out on its own, since I know it’ll be controversial with some of you. I decided that now was a good time to make a change and I’ve gone from full text of all articles in the RSS feeds I’m now going with partial feeds for longer articles. Anything shorter than 250 words should come through complete, but the longer articles will be truncated. 

This is going to upset some folks (I’ve already gotten one complaint), but now, as I’ve just started rolling out some major changes to the site and making a fresh commitment to better content it seems like the best time to make this change, as my readership is probably as low as it’s going to get (at least, I hope so!) and it’s best to do something like this at the beginning and not down the road after I’ve started posting content and the audience starts building again.

Why do this? Two reasons: one is the growing problems with spam sites and scraper sites that steal and repost content without permission by sucking RSS feeds just to populate sites aimed to suck page views by stealing content.  But the other is that I feel that as the size of the article grows and there’s more complex formatting and the images and other media I’m planning on using that it becomes more important to see it within the context of the site design and styling. 

I have grappled with this one a lot. I understand the arguments on both sides. But you know what I finally realized? I’m just not that desperate to have people read me, and I’ve come to believe that there’s a value in the design and styling of the site that gets lost in the RSS feed and so I’m just not going to keep pushing my long-form content out that way and make it easy for the scrapers to steal it. 

If you aren’t’ willing to click through to read my article (one click and one page load) is too much hassle for you, then well, it’s been nice. 

Posted in Working on Web Sites

Forster’s Tern

Forster's Tern

Forster’s Tern at the hunt, Shoreline Lake, Mountain View, California. 

Posted in Photography - Birds, Photography - Portfolio Shots

Stories Told Here

Over the weekend I rolled in some changes to the site, including an updated front page. I’ve been spending the last few months trying to figure out what this site needed to be about — or whether it was time to just shut it down and do something else. 

“Chuqui 3.0″ is retired, thank god. That was then, I stuck with it far too long, mostly because I wasn’t sure what came next. 

I’ve felt for a while that the blog has been sort of on idle. I haven’t really committed to writing for it consistently and when I have written, I haven’t felt like I’ve been putting my best effort or content out. The same has been true of my photography. For a while, that was okay; I wasn’t trying to turn this into anything specific or generate an income stream, and honestly, it more or less matched life in general. There are times when you need to just back off and tell yourself it’s okay to coast and not worry about it. 

It’s time to start pushing myself again, figuring out what I want to focus on over the next few years, and make it happen. The question was, what? 

That turned out to be a difficult question to answer. Over the last year, I’ve been researching whether or not to jump back into my fiction writing, which I’d put on hold “for a while” about 20 years ago. With the ebook revolution going on, there are definitely market opportunities that weren’t there five years ago. 

Or do I jump back into the mobile space? It’s sometimes hard to remember that I went to work for Palm because there were apps I wanted to write and things I wanted to explore on mobile devices, but I’ve now been away from that circus for a while and that’s been tugging at my attention again. 

A discussion of why I made the choices I did might happen some other time, but at least for now, what I’ve decided to do is put the focus back on my photography and to finally invest the time into the blog and the site to make it do what I’ve always wanted it to do, but never was willing to invest in.

This weekend’s update isn’t “the new blog”, but the new front page. There’s still a lot of work needed, but to get to this point meant making a huge number of decisions, both about design, and content and intent. The two big criticisms I had about the site were that it wasn’t really about anything (it was just a holding place for stuff I stuck on it) and that the design was cluttered and sloppy. 

It is time to fix that. Laurie offered to design the logo, and I think she did an awesome job on it. The logo really defines the direction I’m setting out on: at my core, I’m a photographer, and at the core of my photography are birds and nature. The last time I re-did the site, I split the focus of the site between my photography and the blog, and the result was a cluttered mess (toss in affiliate advertising and various other gadgets and things and blocks and toys, and when you end up with is fail).

So, the new front page. It’s all about my imagery. If you come to me site, that’s what you see. I’m working on an updated blog page that will focus on the blog and try to do justice to the words the way I hope the front page sets the stage for the images. 

The three pages that will be the foundation for the site will be the front page, the blog page and the portfolio page. One down, one partially done. Just starting to hash out how I want to display images in a non-sucky way. I don’t think I do a bad job of it, but I’b not really doing a great job. I’m tired of okay-for-now-someday.  I’ve made a few changes on the blog side — the new text font is Libre Baskerville, which I quite like — but there’s still work to do. I realize some will think I should just hold everything and do a “big splash” update all at once; my view is the iteration over time will let both you and myself benefit as I figure this out, and I expect I’ll be spending time over the next few months working through all of the details. 

About the Front Page

The front page of the site sets the tone and style for everything else. It’s got a unique look and feel that won’t be matched by the other pages, but the rest of the site will borrow from the decisions I made building it as I build them out as well. The goals were straightforward: nuke the baby blue for something a lot whiter and neutral (but it’s not white; there’s still the barest touch of blue in it). Clear out the clutter and anything that wasn’t directly about me (like the affiate advertising), and make it very crisp and clear what the site is about. 

The blog page will complicate that message again — the blog is not JUST photography, but basically the current content mix — but the front page needs to keep it simple. 

The new tag line for the site is “Stories Told Here“. A very simple statement, but you don’t want to know how many hours of my life I spent figuring that out. Photography long ago stopped being about showing up at a place, grabbing a random shot and posting it. It’s about understanding a place, and finding a way through my work to see it and feel it and understand it. It’s one thing for me to take a picture of a flock of geese flying, and it’s another thing altogether to be there as 20,000 geese all take off and fly around and over you, screaming their freaking heads off. 

That’s part of where I’m trying to push my work. It’s not just taking that “icon shot” as it is trying to create a context to help all of you understand and appreciate what caused me to photograph it. That is going to involve more than displaying a picture, and I’ve started experimenting with both longer form works (writing and pictures, and collections of pictures) and other techniques such as including audio or video. As my abilities to integrate this stuff mature, hopefully what I’m seeing in my head will make sense to you and help you see things as I saw them (and if not, well, I’ll try something else). 

It’s not about taking a picture, or posting it online. It’s about telling a story. 

A story of a place, or a thing, or a being. 

And that journey — or this leg of that journey — starts now. Enjoy the ride. 

 

 

Posted in About Chuq, Working on Web Sites

Things You’ll Find Interesting March 25, 2013

Here are some items I found today that I thought you’d find interesting:

Posted in Things You'll Find Interesting

White-Crowned Sparrow

White-Crowned Sparrow

 

White-Crowned Sparrow, Morro Bay Harbor, California.

One of my favorite birds, these little sparrows arrive in the fall and winter here in California, Easily found wandering bushy areas eating seeds, they’re arrival is a sign winter is coming, and their leaving tells us Spring is here.

Posted in Photography - Birds, Photography - Portfolio Shots

Things I hate about your web site

Because of the announcement to retire Google Reader, I’ve been visiting web sites to understand what (if any) contact points those sites have other than RSS. 

I’ve also been working on some updates to my own web site (again), and spending a fair amount of time looking at how other people do various things to help decide what to do about mine. 

The results are not pretty. 

Beyond this basic reality, of course: when Google Reader retires in a few weeks, a lot of people who current subscribe to your site are going to lose access to it. Are you working on alternatives for them? Are you going to make it easy for them to switch to a different setup? Or are you assuming that they are going to simply moves to one of the other RSS readers? Or even know they have to? If you don’t tell them what options they have and what they can do to continue watching your site, what percentage of your readers will go dark when Google Reader does?

Seems to me anyone who depends on an RSS feed for subscribers ought to be working on a plan to help their readers transition. 

But beyond that, there are a lot of web sites that seem mostly interested in convincing me not to use them or subscribe to their content. Here are some common highlights. Am I talking your site here?

Are you hiding?

Are you on twitter? Facebook? Pinterest? If so, why are you hiding that from me? It’s amazing how many sites don’t mention what other places the site has a presence. Or if they do, they stick it in a random place. sometimes it’s on the “about” page. Sometimes a “social media” page. sometimes the footer. Sometimes they put in in author pages, and sometimes it’s just stuck on a random page somewhere for laughs. Lots of times it’s missing. And far too often, it’s promoting a link to something that’s broken. 

With Google Reader going away, making it easy for readers to find a way to stay in touch with your content other than RSS is going to be increasingly necessary. So IMHO, your key points of presence (twitter, Google+, Facebook) need to be on the front page, above the fold — in other words, in your header, preferably on every page. And then list all of them on your about page, or on a social media page easily found from the about page or about menu. As the non-geeks figure out what it means to have Google Reader go away, they’re going to want options. Don’t hide them. 

Don’t get in the way

Why is it that so many sites thin the first thing they should do when I go to their site to read something is prevent me from reading it? I don’t care if it’s because you want me to download your app (no! just let me read this article!) or subscribe to your newsletter (no! just let me read this article!). Or you stick up an interceding ad for me to watch before I’m allowed to read the content (this, actually, I have some sympathy for, because I know you have to pay the bills. Except for the sites that won’t let me skip past the ad; that’s greedy, and rarely do I wait). You get special bonus points if you don’t take no for an answer, and push this on me every time I visit the site. Except after a couple of times of visiting the site and getting hit up like this, I stop.

And consider sharing links to sites that do this? Don’t hold your breath… the reality is, when you and your site put your interests (sucking my information out of me so you can market at me) ahead of my interests, what you really do is make me not want to read your content. And depending on how annoying you are, I won’t. So you may think you’re doing something positive (“look how many subscribers I’ve added to my mailing list this month!”) and lots of SEO pundits suggest these techniques as ways to drive that stuff — have you ever pondered how many potential subscribers you lose by being so pushy? How many link shares you lose from people who refuse to send friends to sites like that? And it’s unnecessary. There are less intrusive but useful ways to do this.

I mean, seriously. How often do you enjoy shopping at stores that require you to swipe your credit card as you enter and not when you check out? think about it. 

Are you using your site’s page space effectively?

Speaking of links, have you stopped to consider just how much of your site’s screen real-estate you’re giving over to those social media sharing buttons? And how wonderfully they clash with your carefully built site design? When was the last time someone actually referred an article of yours to Stumbeupon? Or Reddit? or Digg? Six months ago? Never? In reality, you probably can’t tell me because you don’t know — so why are you giving those buttons VIP-class real estate on your site? Or promoting links to sites you don’t use and may never have actually visited. Do you know if getting a wave of users from Reddit visiting you is a good thing? Or just lots of useless pageviews? 

Are you a ghost town? 

Sometimes I think people never actually visit their own sites, or clicked on links on their site. 

What does it say when I click a link that takes me to your twitter account, which you haven’t used in six months? (or replace twitter with Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, Google+, or name whatever trendy fad thing you stuck on your site that you got bored with a week later. Or which fell over and died, and now you have a link to, well, nothing. All you’re doing is convincing me you’re not really active and that your site content is old and stale. Now that’s a solid marketing message, right? 

If you’re not active on a service, don’t promote a link to it. 

I’m not even going to talk about sites that still heavily promote Google Friend Connect. Forever god, why is 20% of your site front page filled with content about it? 

Is your contact mode telling me to email you at fred at gmail dot calm? WHY? That is so 2002. Why make it hard for users to contact you? Worried about spam? Here’s the hint: your mail provider has spam figured out, or you need a new mail provider. And those “obfuscated” email addresses were figured out by spammers long ago, if they remotely cared to. This is one of those techniques that long ago stopped being useful, but people keep doing it. Why? Because, well, someone somewhere told them to. 

Just cut it out. It’s like copy protection on software: it doesn’t stop the people you want to stop, but it gets in the way of people you actually want to contact you. 

Those are the highlights of my recent tour. Have I missed any of your favorite site mistakes? 

 

 

Posted in The Internet

Things You’ll Find Interesting March 24, 2013

Here are some items I found today that I thought you’d find interesting:

Posted in Things You'll Find Interesting

Things You’ll Find Interesting March 23, 2013

Here are some items I found today that I thought you’d find interesting:

Posted in Things You'll Find Interesting

Buried Treasure…

One of the fun parts of tearing apart the office was finding the occasional thing that you’d completely forgotten you had. Like this:

IMG 0311

I’ve already had a couple of offers for it. I’m keeping it, at least until I decide the best thing to do with it. Or maybe just as a reminder of what could have been. There’s three years of my life buried in that box somewhere. Hiding and twitching, I expect.

Posted in About Chuq

Google’s Trust Problem

Daring Fireball Linked List: Google’s Trust Problem:

All companies cancel services and abandon apps. The difference with Google Reader is that they’ve canceled something beloved.

Almost every service cancelled has fans that loved the service. 

The true difference here is that Google Reader was a service beloved by high profile bloggers and media types who have a platform to complain about it where people actually listen. 

Honestly, I’m still not convinced that (a) it didn’t deserve to die, and (b) that by finally pulling the plug, Google did everyone a long-term service by removing the thing that it no longer was investing in but was preventing anyone else from attempting to innovate in this space. Given the reaction of various companies since the announcement, instead of complaining about this, I think maybe Google deserves our thanks for finally getting out of the way and letting this market space bloom again. 

Posted in The Internet

Things You’ll Find Interesting March 22, 2013

Here are some items I found today that I thought you’d find interesting:

Posted in Things You'll Find Interesting

The new office, same as the old office. but different

The “list of things I’m trying to get done and off the list of things I need to get done so I can get back to blogging” continues. The most recent project has been a complete rebuild of the home office. Here’s how it looked a week ago:

IMG 0295

 

And here’s how it looks now. 

IMG 0298

I’m  still waiting for one final flat-pack set of drawers to arrive, but the major work is done. In the old office was a desk I lovingly call the battleship. I’ve had it for around 15 years. It’s made of 1″ thick oak plywood and solid oak pieces. It’s 6.5 feet long, and 4 feet deep, angling out to almost 5 feet. It has a cubby for a tower PC, which obviously, nobody would consider using for a computer any more so it’s turned into storage cubbies. A keyboard shelf that was huge, but not large enough for a Wacom. And a pull out shelf for a printer, which fits no printers we’d use today, so again, more storage. and all of those are deep shelves, so you use the front 18″, and the rest sits there empty, breeding dust bunnies. It is a dust bunny factory, always has been. 

That desk has been a great desk. But in practice? Not very flexible, and in the modern computing age, the desk space is increasingly wasted and unusable. about eight or nine years ago, I added a second mini-desk as a work space, but it’s size — about 18″ deep and 3 feet long — meant in practice it was mostly useful for dumping stuff on, not working on stuff. 

One of my — not goals, but determinations — for 2013 was to deal with all of those tasks and projects that had fallen into the “someday I need to do this” file. More and more it became clear that it was time to update the home office. 

So I have. Out with the battleship; now in the back yard where it’s going to end up in pieces for the landfill. I’d originally thought of donating it, but to be honest, it’s in pretty tough shape and had a long life. It’s also, from what I can tell, over 300 pounds, and I’d have to rearrange many parts of my house to get it to a place where I could store it until I could get the Salvation Army out here to pick it up, and I just can’t feel it’s worth what it’d take to do so. I feel a bit guilty. But not much. Out went my tiny desk (it will go to SA soon). 

And in comes a Geekdesk. I’ve been thinking that getting a sit/stand desk is a smart idea for a while. I’ve been researching them for a while. Laurie picked up a manually adjustable standing desk from Anthrocart a few years back and loves it; she uses a tall chair with it and that works well. I love the quality of the Anthrocarts, but to get the electric model — just more than I wanted to spend. I researched half a dozen other flavors of sit/stand desk, and kept coming back to the Geekdesk. Not the cheapest, but everyone I know who’s picked one up loves them. Mine is the smaller sized max model, which cost about $1200 including shipping.

It is built like a tank. I expected to be impressed by the build quality, but it beat my expectations. It weighs about 250-300 pounds, and arrived in three boxes. Assembly required a Phillips-head screwdriver, and took me under 2 hours. The system that raises and lowers the table works quietly, quickly and smoothly.

This model is about 3 feet deep by about 4 feet. Smaller than my old main desk, but perfectly sized as a computer workstation, which is what I do most of the time. To replace that old mini-desk I used to drop stuff on, I picked up an inexpensive flat-pack desk, which is about 2 feet by 4 feet. Toss in a couple of flat-pack drawer sets and a small vertical file, and that gives me places to stick stuff with more storage space than I had before, plus good surfaces for my printers. 

My office space is about 9 foot by 9 foot, part of a larger room where the other half is our media area with a couch and the TV. Effectively it has one wall. The second “wall” is the couch, the third “wall” is the glass door out to the patio (good views. lots of glare if I open the drapes), and the fourth “wall” is the space I have to leave free as access to the patio, with wall space beyond that for bookcases. So building the area out I have limited wall space (but I don’t need bookshelves, since they live “outside” the office). I was trying to make sure I kept the view to the TV and the great outside clear, positioned the monitor to minimize the glare (I’m probably going to build a foam board glare screen on it soon), and had easy access to the computer space and the project desk. 

Having just moved in, I’m still figuring out what goes in which drawer where. Adding the drawer space means that much of the stuff that I’ve been sticking in storage crates will move into drawers, and the crates can “go away” and I can stop tripping on them. I’ve over-bought drawer space, knowing a year from know, I’ll wish I’d bought more.. And yes, going through every bit of everything moving it from the old drawer to a temp space to the new drawer has given me a chance to throw out a lot of “why do I have that? Oh yeah, I used that THREE computers ago” stuff. 

The computer workspace is now set up for what I use it for most, meaning my photography and and the internet. I’ve added speakers since more and more video and audio is coming out of the computer. Since I had everything torn up, it was a good time to redo the lighting in the room, replace all of the power strips and generally revamp all of those boring details that I hopefully won’t need to worry about again for another decade. 

I started doing research on this in December. It’s mid-March. It’s been far from a full-time project during that time, except the last week or so. I probably have another week as I finish moving in and tweaking where stuff lives. But I love the results, and I’m a lot more comfortable working on the new desk, and I’m looking forward to the ability to stand up — all the research shows that it’s a smart change to make. And there’s a lot less dust hiding in the room now, but man, there isn’t enough sedated in the universe right now… 

One question I expect to come up in all of this — treadmill desks. I did research them and there’s a lot of interesting possibility here, but….

At this point in my life, I know I’m not ready/able to use a treadmill desk full time, and with my knees, a full-time standup desk isn’t in the plans; that’s why I went with the adjustable Geekdesk, since I want to be able to stand as much as the knees will allow, and I expect as I do it, they’ll let me do more of it. (the reason I spent more on an electric adjustable is because I know if it’s manual, I’ll just set it for the seated position and not stand up. Convenience makes a difference and spending a bit on convenience makes sense here). I also knew I was doing the second desk, so unlike laurie I didn’t want a high chair — she actually has two chairs in her office, a low one for her work desk. 

the treadmill desks just didn’t fit what I need right now. but they’re still on my radar; I could see putting one in somewhere else in the house at some point. Maybe. But I didn’t want to build a primary workspace around one, so I decided to leave it until sometime later. I definitely see the trend and advantage of doing something like this down the road. 

So for the executive summary — the Geekdesk rocks, and the new office solves all of the things that were annoying me about the old office. It’s going to be fun to figure out what new annoyances exist in the office that I haven’t discovered yet. Interestingly enough, the total amount of desktop space is a bit smaller than the old office, but a lot more usable. And now I’m not constantly rolling the @#$@##$ printer out of the way when I’m trying to do something else… 

 

Posted in About Chuq