Regular blogging will return once I get past this short interregnum.

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Time for a Blog Vacation. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• What Kind of Fear Owns You?
• Photographic reality
• The Sandbox’s Big Red Button
• An interesting job with mixed light sources. On the stage.

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 13, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

In the West, I predicted the Blues and the Predators. Please stop snickering. 

In the east, I thought it would be the Flyers and Rangers. 

So I’m 1-3 in the second, and 5-7 for the playoffs. 

I don’t feel too bad. I expect whoever wins the major hockey fantasy pools this year is doing so with a dartboard. So it goes…

So now, we’re down to four teams, and the conference finals. Let me place the kiss of death on a couple of teams and predict them to win:

In the west: Phoenix and Los Angeles. Goalie Smith and the mission from god squad, vs. Goalie Quick and the Lombardi mob. Much as I’d love to see the Coyotes continue to confound the critics who wish they’d shut up and fail already, I have to give this one to the Kings, primarily because I think Quick is on a mission from god just like Smith is, but I think the Kings are playing better hockey. We’ll find out starting in about 30 minutes…  Call it six games.

And in the east? The more I watch the Rangers, the more I believe in them. More importantly, they believe in themselves. And the more I watch New Jersey, I won’t take them lightly, but I just think Lundquist can and will out duel Brodeur, and the Rangers are playing better hockey. So Rangers in five. 

So my call for stanley cup final: Rangers/Kings. Which should make NBC happy, and generate some really good (and low scoring) hockey. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Predicting the conference finals... This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• My personal take: 3 reasons I don’t like newspaper paywalls
• Thoughts About ‘Backup Cameras’
• Driving the Dalton Highway in Winter
• How To Stop The Shot-Blocking
• → Critical Photoshop CS5 security vulnerability won’t be patched
• Are you really getting ripped off on printer ink? | Ars Technica
• Legal Fallout of Dave Duerson’s suicide

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 12, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

Oh, heck. too cute. Here’s one more of this sea otter and her pup…. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otter and her pup. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• AAR Fail
• Prismatic’s Global Newsfeed
• Kudos to Culver City
• British Birds Made of LEGO | Colossal
• Winter, Still Coming
• PKD in OC
• The reinvention of the bookseller
• Why I think the Olympus OM-D, EM-5 is making so many waves.
• 1859′s "Great Auroral Storm"—the week the Sun touched the earth

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 11, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

While nursing the pup will hang onto the mom. She doesn’t let it go far, but in this case, the two were playing “you practice your floating”, but every time it got a little distance away, she hauled it back in where she could keep a paw on it… 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otter and her pup. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• My role in the Groupon story
• Speaking on the TED@Tunis Stage
• What’s is Peru’s dolphin and pelican die-off telling us? | Deep Sea News
• HTML9 Responsive Boilerstrap JS
• Quenneville uses leverage, plus 30 Thoughts | Hockey | CBC Sports

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 10, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

Here, the otter has cracked open lunch and is enjoying it. This gives you a nice shot of her cradling her rock. The otter will hold onto the rock through multiple dives for snacks.

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otter Snacking. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• Art is a Popularity Contest, Not a Democracy
• Full Moon Rising
• Edie’s Trip Report: Tioga Road
• Notes From Chad: Funding Etsy’s Future | Etsy News
• Prismatic Goes Public
• Tonal Adjustments in the Age of Lightroom 4
• The Big Idea: Mark Teppo
• Giving the Velocity website a performance makeover
• The future of media on mobile and iPads isn’t about web beating apps, but better planning and implementation | Revert to Saved: A blog about design, gaming and technology
• Tempo, and bird song identification
• A Behind The Scenes Look at the Making of a Lee Filter
• Digital Darkroom Techniques with Carl Caylor
• AppleInsider: “Apple says lack of multi-user support on iPad is a ‘known issue,’ ‘being investigated’” – Marco.org
• How Hewlett-Packard lost its way – Fortune Tech

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 9, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

Sea Otter week continues… Sea Otters don’t come onto shore much, so they sleep in the water. One of the things they will do is wrap themselves in a kelp plan before napping, so that it keeps them in place so they don’t float off in the current. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otter Napping. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• John Sheehan : The API Developer Experience Baseline
• How air freshener research led to a new fuel-cell charger for phones
• Birding the Owens Lake Big Day
• Returning to the scene of the crime
• Kirk’s Take: Electronic Viewfinders
• TUAW Bookshelf — The Business of iPhone and iPad Development: Making and Marketing Apps
• Mediacurrent: Webinar: The Drupal Media Initiative

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 8, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

Sea Otters will feed on shellfish and mussels, but they need a bit of help getting the shells opened. What they’ll do is bring a rock up from the bottom and put it on their bellies, and then beat the crap out of whatever it is they want to eat to crack the shell. It’s effective, if a bit splashy….

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otter feeding. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• Felicia Day goes Neo-Victorian in a Steampunk Photoshoot – YouTube
• The Most Overrated Social Media Metric | Social Media Metrics | Social Media Consulting – Convince & Convert
• Why Scott Thompson’s “inadvertent error” is a big deal
• Supermoon in Seattle
• Why Publishers Don’t Like Apps – Technology Review
• Did your parents have a Chevy when you were growing up?
• Broken Promises and Stock Photography
• Is It Photography?
• Whisky Advocate Blog
• Style Guides, Mood Boards, And Style Tiles: 3 Tools To Keep Design Projects On Track
• This Is All Your App Is: a Collection of Tiny Details
• Why I write about bathroom fans and pillowcasing strategies
• What Photographers Must Know About Using Extreme Wide Angle Lenses

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 7, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

Sea Otter week continues. This shot was taken just as dawn was starting to break, bathing morro bay harbor with this fascinating golden light. three minutes later? gone…. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otter at Dawn. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• Today’s Video Link
• Young women are (still) the best internet bait and 5 other lessons from ESPN’s blogger scandal
• Is the 1% rule dead? The BBC thinks so, but it’s wrong
• Tom the Dancing Bug’s Inner Hive
• The No Future League
• What Would the End of Football Look Like?
• Football, Dogfighting, and Brain Damage
• Lasting value
• The death of genre
• A Few Thoughts for the Weekend:-)
• BYOD and the security fun-sponge
• Why geeks (and other lean machines) need high-intensity workouts

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 6, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

It is sea otter week here on Photo of the day. Why? Because they’re cute, that’s why. But look at those teeth. they have claws, too. Cute is not the same as tame. Or safe. So keep your distance…. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Sea Otters. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• The death of genre
• Tolerance and Prosperity
• Modern pharmaceuticals becoming part of the culture in the NHL – The Globe and Mail
• Kris’s Post – Spread the Word
• Photography: It’s a Marathon | Nicolesy

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 5, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

A harbor seal practicing for the Harbor Seal Olympics in the high jump. He’s about as graceful on the sand as I am. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Harbor Seal. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

The Epson 2880 printer has arrived, and setup is beginning. With wide format printers, you have to remember they’re big, they’re heavy, and with art paper, it’s fed flat, so you need to be able to clear space on both sides for the paper to be put through. this weekend, I’ll start with the test prints and see how things go… 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at The printer’s here….. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• Success as a Photographer | Nature and Photography
• 3 iPad Photography Solutions For Going On The Road
• Amanda Palmer, Kickstarter, and Everything
• Today’s Video Link – News From ME
• Why ESPN doesn’t cover hockey | Puck Daddy – Yahoo! Sports
• You Can Call Clint Malarchuk A Survivor
• Disqus overhauls commenting system to improve quality of conversations
• Prismatic wants to be the newspaper for a digital age

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 4, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

The one criticism I’ve had of Sharks ownership and business team is that they are followers, not innovators. This has been true pretty much since day one. I’ve always wanted this team to drive innovation in the league; it is silicon valley’s team, after all, where a lot of this innovation happens in the world. But the  organization has never taken a league leadership role and always seems to wait for other teams to drive innovations — not surprisingly, given its owner, one of the more innovative teams is the Capitals. Maybe someday this will change, but I’m not holding my breath, and I don’t see the new ownership making this change.

The Sharks were one of the first league teams to have an internet presence, for instance (I know this, because Laurie and I were demoing this funky thing called a browser to them back around 1994 and telling them that this was going to be important to get in front of) — yet after being one of the early (maybe the first) teams to have a web site, they have pretty much followed what the league does rather than led the league forward. There are so many things happening here in the valley where the organization could potentially bring the partnership into the league and foster it through to the other teams, but that’s just not their mindset. They’re followers. Which is okay, but I always hoped for more. 

In my comments on the Sharks, I noted my disappointment that they were followers, not innovators in the league, especially in areas where their residence in Silicon Valley might give them networking opportunities to drive technology innovation into the league. Instead, other teams do that.

Caps and Wizards on Pinterest | Ted’s Take:

Click here. We are starting to build out a series of community of interests on this new social network. We will evolve it and make them better day by day. Pin away.

 

Which is why I thought I’d note that the Capitals are at it again, under the leadership of Ted Leonsis, and have added Pinterest into their social media mix for the teams. Pinterest, based in Palo Alto, about 30 minutes from Sharks world headquarters. And who’s doing the innovation with them?

The team in Washington D.C. 

Well done to the Caps for continuing to innovate and evangelize those innovations into the league. And it’s too bad the Sharks aren’t taking advantage of living in Silicon Valley to build the networks around the Valley that would both make the team a visible leader around the league, but help build the networking connections around their home region that would likely lead to future partnerships and sponsorships as the companies they work with grow and mature… 

(it just seems to me that there are opportunities here in business development, sponsorships, foundation and fundraising work, PR and Marketing, and in increasing the organization’s influence within the league power structure. Except none of it seems to be a priority…)

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Leaders and followers…. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

The National Hockey League Players’ Association has filed an appeal of the 25-game suspension handed to Phoenix forward Raffi Torres last month.

Torres was penalized during the Western Conference Quarterfinals for a late hit to the head of Chicago Blackhawks forward Marian Hossa in Game 3 of the series. Hossa did not return to the game or the series, which Phoenix won in six games.

As I thought they would, the League came down hard and heavy on Torres. 25 games is a massive suspension. After thinking about it for a fews days, Torres and the Players Association have decided to appeal. 

There are really two reasons for this appeal. One is that this suspension is too heavy; nobody is suggesting that Torres should not be suspended, but even the more rabid “nuke him until he glows” believers seem to have trouble supporting this length of a ban. I’d suggested that the league would see Torres as a convenient target to make a statement, and it seems they did exactly that. I have trouble with 25 games off, even given Torres’ history of this kind of nasty hit. 

The other reason to appeal this is Donald Fehr, the head of the players association. the CBA negotiations are coming up. Bargaining chips are useful. And what’s the appeal process here? It’s heard by Commissioner Bettman, who happens to be Brendan Shanahan’s boss. In baseball, it’s fairly common for an appeal to get a bit of time shaved off by Bud Selig. In the NHL, to my knowledge an appeal has never been upheld or a suspension modified. (and in baseball, appeals are routine; in the NHL, they are exceptionally rare. coincidence? no). 

One can only imagine that the players association would love to see appeals be changed so it’s not strictly up to Bettman. A few media types suggested this should all go to arbitration, but there are reasons (a big one being need for timeliness) where that’s not a good option, but this suspension gives Fehr a chance to rattle the cage a bit and generate some talking points for the negotiation — even if it’s a demand for different appeal processes that gets given up as a concession along the way (which I’d say is likely if this is tried). So at the least, Shanahan has given the players association a small bargaining chip for the CBA talks. 

And it’s possible this could turn into a headache for the league later if the PA chooses to make it one. I hope Shanahan and Bettman don’t regret making a statement here down the road.

And having said that — I’m troubled by this suspension. it’s excessive. I’m making no apologies for Torres, but given how Shanahan has been ruling this season, I’d say it really should have been 10-15 games, not 25. I expect the appeal to go nowhere. I expect the union to make noises about that. Torres will be unhappy (but I don’t care, he made this bed, and now gets to sleep in it for a long time, and so it’s hard to find any sympathy for him. 

But what I want to see are clear deterrents to this kind of headhunting behavior, and the one thing this suspension is NOT is a deterrent, because unless you’re a player like Torres, you can see that this kind of ban hammer won’t happen to you. It does nothing to deal with the larger problem of players headhunting, and I think that’s a mistake. There was a middle ground they could have taken that would have made players take notice of the suspension. this isn’t that middle ground. 

And that disappoints me, because the league punished a serious offender, but still isn’t doing enough to solve the problem. 

I hate to be in Torres’ camp for this one, but I think the league over-reacted. And I don’t feel better for having predicted it… 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at NHLPA files appeal of Torres’ 25-game suspension. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

If you ever get a chance to visit this exhibit, do so. It’s awesome. 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Jellyfish, Monterey Bay Aquarium. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• 13 Years Ago, I Became the Accordion Guy
• m.e.driscoll: data utopian • the secret guild of silicon valley
• iPad productivity apps
• What’s missing from the current practice of photography.
• I’m going to get geeky and talk about an actual job.
• Hey Google — your G+ desperation is showing
• 5 Tips for Long Exposure Photography — by Nicole S. Young « CanvasPop Blog

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 3, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

It’s been a bit quiet on the blog recently, partly because work’s kept me pretty busy (in very good, but you-can’t-see-it-yet ways) and partly because I’ve been digging more into the guts of a few things, and while that’s fun, it’s not necessarily interesting blog fodder. 

Back around the start of the year, I did my annual plan to try to focus my time and energy on the things I thought were most important. What I found, much to my amusement, was that when I started digging in, my “streamlined and focussed action plan” was still rather big and complicated. I ended up thinking through how to streamline it further, and decided on simply looking at two things: my photography, and that it was finally time to stop playing the “some day I’ll have time to do this right” game with chuqui.com. 

The fact is, most of the other stuff I want to do is going to depend on a professional looking, quality site as a foundation to build on. I talked a bit about that when I started working on the new photo gallery, and the more I looked at it, the more I realized I just needed to tear it completely apart and deal with all of the things I’ve patched around or played the “someday I’ll get around to…” game about. 

So I am. The above is a structure diagram of what is going to become the new chuqui.com — unless I change it some more, which I probably will. The pieces in red are done; I’ve added two specialty sub-domains (photos.chuqui.com and files.chuqui.com), and loaded my new photo gallery in one, and a whole bunch of “stuff” in the other — my OtherRealms archive and the mailing list archives from the years Laurie and I ran all of those mailing lists about all of those various things.

The mailing list archives are a fascinating blob of data waiting to be analyzed — about 100,000 files and about 2 gigabytes of email spanning something like 40 mailing lists and about 12 years. I have it back in a usable form, which took some massaging (and trust me, Dropbox does NOT like having 100,000 files dumped on it, and in fact, I have TWO copies of it, one with the email addresses purged, and a private one unaltered).

I’m also using the files subdomain for other stuff, like storing full sized panoramas, and when i get my updated wallpaper download area going, it’ll go in there. So it’s just a big static web site for stuff that will have low usage and doesn’t need much but a big pipe behind it. Both live on Amazon S3, FWIW. 

The two orange boxes are the things I’m currently working on. It was time to rethinking the wallpaper downloads, especially given the new iPad with Retina display (which I don’t have yet, I bought a printer instead…). One thing I’ve found in researching best practices for how to format and distribute wallpapers is this: there are none. Because of this, I’m trying to decide what makes sense, and how to explain the decisions I make (when I make them), in hopes of maybe helping along creating some. 

The other orange box has turned into one of those proverbial “big hairy beasts”. For a while I’ve been posting my “shared links” every night; originally using Google Reader as the host, and when Google did away with that functionality (grrrr. grump), I experimented with some options, and finally decided to implement it through Instapaper — for now — because I could get equivalent functionality. 

Quick digression. Early on, I called them “Shared links”, and enough people read it that I kept doing it. While I was figuring out the “post Google” version of this, for a while I fed all of the links to Twitter, and then did a nightly link of my Twitter activity. My analytics show that my readership of those postings fairly quickly went to ZERO. None. NADA. It was an easy decision to nuke that idea. Those of you who feel strongly that every word you utter needs to be permanently archived and who capture and archive all of that stuff to your blog? check your analytics. Just sayin’. What the universe was sayin’ to me was “dude, that’s a waste of electrons”, and their right. (but the whole “we must archive every word we say forever and ever” thing is its whole own essay, which I need to get to some day).

So I finally went back to the old model, using a new database and capture setup around Instapaper. It’s simply, it works, and it’s reliable. But I decided to try framing it differently, so instead of calling it “shared links”, I now call it “Things you’ll find interesting”. Daily readership of those items is consistently about 30% higher than the old “shared links” postings. Those geeks out there that pooh-pooh marketing and branding of things, well, check your analytics. A little quiet positioning can do interesting things.

But simply posting links isn’t what I want to do in the long term. Some links only warrant a link. Some  I want to comment on to some degree or another. Others end up becoming jumping off points for entire blog posts. the problem is managing all of that without huge amounts of manual work, because, frankly, the more hassle it is to do, the less I’m likely to actually do it. So it has to be easy.

And this has turned into what I’m now calling the “collect, curate and comment” project. The current setup handles the first two well, and the third not at all. I’ve got an idea where this is going, but it’s not fleshed out yet. When it is, I’ll talk about it further. I will put a couple of sticks in the sand and say that both Duncan Davidson’s blog, and John Gruber at Daring Fireball have a better handle on this than most, but it’s still not what I think it could be. Ultimately I think having too many “link posts” clutter up the blog stream, which is why I like the one-post-a-day setup I’m using. The question is how to integrate commentary into it, and the answer is “I’m not sure yet”. 

I am considering doing a separate link blog that I suck in as a daily post. I think using WordPress and make each one its own post, and use the excerpts for the commentary, I can come close (maybe); use Marsedit as the front end, and perhaps a link posting bookmarklet or something. Lots of moving parts, and integration might be painful. 

The alternative is to go full monty, and build a custom web app with a database in the back that I feed stuff out to, with some automated way to suck it back out. Full customized interface,  plus easy (for me) posting hookups. The questions I’m grappling with here are complicated: is this way overkill for what I want to do? Am i re-inventing Delicious or Magnolia (remember them?) and is that what I really want? And if I do this, is the blog post really the final result, or should this be a web-visible, query-able database that people can poke at, and if I do that, what the hell am I getting myself into?  It seems like a fun hack, but.. is that really where I want to go? 

So I’m down a rathole, and I’m trying to refine the idea so I can build it and move on. I’m enjoying the process, but… well, I can do it easy, or I can do it right. and I’m tired of easy-but-sloppy. I’m just trying to decide what right is. (and, well, there’s an entire philosophy of signal vs. noise and creating value in your content, and the philosophy of curation and how that all relates to blogs and this internet thingie, but that’s another essay, too). And then there are times when I think I’m in “thinking too hard” mode again… 

What are the other colored blocks? The purple block is the “this is silicon valley” project I talked about back in January. It has, of course, blossomed and grown in scope since then, but I also put it on hold to focus. Assuming it doesn’t mutate further, it’ll eventually become it’s own site, and it’s now clearly a multi-year project, even if I don’t grow the damn thing to include other contributors, which I’m considering. For now, though, it’s a purple box that I’m ignoring until I get some other things done…

The green blocks are parts of the site redesign I can’t do until I upgrade to a new WordPress theme. I’ve chosen a theme — Photocrati is the core I’ll be designing around — but there’s a whole lot of work to do before it sees the light of day. The lavender is the rest of the site, various bits and pieces that need to be shampooed, walls painted, maybe some new trim, metadata and content refreshed (and the crap thrown out), etc. Lots of deferred maintenance and a re-thinking of the writing and content areas.  I’m working on some of that now, and unless you’re looking closely, you won’t notice those changes because that’s all being worked in quietly and gradually. 

One aspect of that is that I am going back through and editing out the crap from the site and postings. So far, I’ve deleted about 90 blog posts, and I’m probably going to find another 50 or so worthy of termination. For those of you who who think that words should never disappear into the ether, tough. There’s a lot of crap on the internet, and some of it is on my blog. I’d rather it not be there. This brings me down below 2000 blog postings again, and since I’ve gone through these purges in the past, I know I’ve nuked probably 1/3 of the entries I’ve written oner the last 12 years or so. Which is fine, I’m not trying to win the “he wrote more entries than anyone else longer than anyone else” award. 

I do wish WordPress would implement a “termination date” option for blog postings. There are any number of things I post that I know that two or three months from now nobody will ever care about again, and I wish I could just pre-set the system to make them go away. But I seem to be the only person who worries about things like that, so instead, every so often I wander the site looking for crap, and when I find it, I haul out the shovel and start mucking… 

Oh, and that last color on the diagram? the teal? That’s the next piece to come, when I figure out the curation and commenting. If you know my past and you’ve watched the blog over time, you can probably figure out what I’m thinking of here. I’m still noodling on the concept, though, so we’ll defer detailed discussion for now… But yeah, it’s about reviews and reviewing, just like OtherRealms was. 

Well, right now it is. It may mutate further… 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Working on the web site…. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

The other thing I did on Sunday was check up on the bald eagle’s nest on Calaveras Reservoir. Because of work and life, I haven’t gotten out there for about six weeks, and since my last visit, the eggs have hatched and the chicks are growing. 

This is just a status shot, I didn’t stay long and they weren’t cooperating. I missed the male by about ten minutes, but both parents are busy rearing the kids again this year. I try to take photos of the nest when I visit so I can compare the nest over time — the photos of the nest over time are on my gallery, and this is the fourth out of the last five years I’ve taken images there (last year, they moved nests and work precluded me visiting more than once). 

You can (mostly) see mom behind the struts, and the brown blob on the left side of the nest is one of the kids laying down. The other chick is down in the nest and I never got a shot of it flapping its wings, which was about all I saw of it. 2009 was the first year they successfully fledged, and they seem to be on the way to two fledges  this year. My (unofficial) count for this nest is 0, 1, 2, N/A, and 2-in-progress, so this has been a very successful nest. There are a couple of first year nests we’ve found, one at Crystal Springs reservoir in San Mateo County (first confirmed bald eagle nesting in the county in a  year), and one down at Pinto Lake in Santa Cruz County — both with younger females and it looks like both failed to hatch this year, but that’s not unusual from what I’ve been told. We’re hoping they’ll both try again next year. 

From what I saw, the chicks  seemed healthy, although they mostly slept when I was watching. One chick is getting close to the size of mom, and both are showing signs of feather growth including primaries. If the eggs were laid around the first week of February, they seem on track for fledging in around the start of June. Again this year, it looks like two chicks are growing to fledging. Mom is hiding behind the stanchion. The brown lump to the left is one (sleeping) chick. the other is down in the nest in front of mom, but was flapping its wings occasionally and did pop a head up once. Both look healthy to me, at least as far as I can tell from this distance.

I’ll try to get out there a couple more times before they fledge and move out for the year, if I can…

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the Day: Calaveras Bald Eagle Nest. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

• USDA’s Wildlife Services program kills 50,000 harmless animals
• You’ll never believe how LinkedIn built its new iPad app (exclusive)
• Ray Tomlinson, the inventor of email: ‘I see email being used, by and large, exactly the way I envisioned’ | The Verge
• Yes, you can shoot at midday!
• Killdeer – Wash, Fluff and Dry
• The process of gently breaking in new cameras.
• Why Yelp is the Digg of local
• Me and Pat Rothfuss and Amber Benson and Felicia Day Talk About Characters For Roughly an Hour
• The Joy of Prints
• What Now: Board Meeting or Bullsh*t?
• FINALISTS: 2012 Locus Awards
• Familiar is not a design – Matt Gemmell
• The Horse-Human Interface
• The annual plumage cycle of a male American Goldfinch
• Syntax-K – Know-How für Ihr Projekt – The Go Programming Language, or: Why all C-like languages except one suck.

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Things You’ll Find Interesting May 2, 2012. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

For me, at least, the answer is a definite yes. I’d been considering buying one for a while, when Mark’s new Epson 3880 convinced me it was time to get serious about this. The 3880 was beyond what I wanted to spend, but I’d been arguing with myself about it’s slightly littler brother, the Epson 2880. Much to my surprise, Adorama had a few as manufacturer refurbished for about $90 off the new price, and that was enough to convince me to grab one (that deal is no longer available, however).

Personally, I wouldn’t buy a used printer (your mileage may vary), given the usage and wear printers go through, and if this was a revenue generating printer I wouldn’t buy refurb, either, but as a low-volume, primarily hobby device, I’m comfortable with this choice. It comes with a warranty, so if I run into issues, I have options.

Why the 2880? I wanted something from a good manufacturer (which, for photo printers, IMHO, means Epson, Canon or HP); I ruled out HP because I find their inks brutally expensive (I don’t work there any more, I can say that now) and their low and medium end devices don’t tickle my toes (and I’m unwilling to pay $3500 or more for a printer yet).  I wanted a wide format printer, this one will do up to 13×19, which is great, as my favorite print sizes are 11×14 and 11×17. And it supports roll paper, which allows for panorama prints, something I really want to explore, and which can be cheaper than pre-cut paper. And the print costs seem reasonable. I really like the Epson UltraChrom Inks, too, and as I explore black and white printing, the Epson inks seemed to be a better choice.

Having said all of that, it  was primarily lack of roll paper support at this price point that made the difference between Epson and Canon, FWIW. Canon has some nice models, too.

The printer is on a truck, trundling this way. I’ll probably be unpacking this weekend and starting to explore.

What do I plan on doing with this? Make prints. Put them up on my wall. Give them away. Expect to see some opportunities on this site for prints once I get settled in.

Why do this? Why not lab prints?

Well, it’s complicated. Maybe for some people lab prints are an option, but one thing I fell in love with using the 8190 were art papers. Big, thick, textured hunks of paper that bring a different look and life to an image. I miss that, and using a lab to print on Hahnemuele German Etching or Photo Rag Pearl is between impossible and unaffordable.

Besides, I enjoy geeking the printer and working to make my prints better.

And that’s the other, bigger aspect of this — I lost an aspect of the quality of my images when I stopped printing. I got comfortable with a “good enough for Flickr”. Over the last few months, I’ve bent taking a close look at what I’m doing and why, and why I haven’t been as happy with the results as I want to be — and I came to realize that when I stopped printing, I stopped getting better, and in fact, my photography regressed. When you only look at your images online — you can get satisfied with the quality a lot sooner in the production process. Putting it on paper, especially at larger sizes, means you can’t tolerate the flaws.

So I came to the decision that to drive my imagery forward again, I had to start putting it on paper again, and I needed to do it myself and not depend on a lab to do it.

Besides, I like giving prints away… (and maybe selling the occasional one).

And the first image I’m going to print on this puppy is this one:

Why?

Well, there’s a story to that…

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Do you need a printer in the house?. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.

I’ve been doing a lot of photography work recently, but without a camera. Sunday, though, I was able to get out for a couple of hours, and visit an infrequent visitor to the coastal part of Santa Clara County. A few Lawrence’s Goldfinches wandered into the Ed Levin Park area near Milpitas from farther inland and have been hanging out — typically, I need to get out to the Mines road or Anderson Valley areas out beyond Mount Hamilton for a chance to see them. 

They were easy to find — I just wandered over to where they’d been seen and looked for the flock of 500mm lenses. This one was sitting on a branch for a good ten minutes, watching us and evidently amused at all the bother. (you can find more images of this bird over on my gallery). Some days, its’ just easy to add a bird to the year list… 

This article was posted on Chuqui 3.0 at Photo of the day: Lawrence’s Goldfinch. This article is copyright 2012 by Chuq Von Rospach under a Creative Commons license for non-commericial use only with attribution. See the web site for details on the usage policy.